Fine-tuning Reinforcement Learning Models is Secretly a Forgetting Mitigation Problem
Maciej Wolczyk, Bartlomiej Cupial, Mateusz Ostaszewski, Michal Bortkiewicz, Michal Zajac, Razvan Pascanu, Lukasz Kucinski, Piotr Milos
Abstract
Fine-tuning is a widespread technique that allows practitioners to transfer pre-trained capabilities, as recently showcased by the successful applications of foundation models. However, fine-tuning reinforcement learning (RL) models remains a challenge. This work conceptualizes one specific cause of poor transfer, accentuated in the RL setting by the interplay between actions and observations: forgetting of pre-trained capabilities. Namely, a model deteriorates on the state subspace of the downstream task not visited in the initial phase of fine-tuning, on which the model behaved well due to pre-training. This way, we lose the anticipated transfer benefits. We identify conditions when this problem occurs, showing that it is common and, in many cases, catastrophic. Through a detailed empirical analysis of the challenging NetHack and Montezuma's Revenge environments, we show that standard knowledge retention techniques mitigate the problem and thus allow us to take full advantage of the pre-trained capabilities. In particular, in NetHack, we achieve a new state-of-the-art for neural models, improving the previous best score from K to over K points in the Human Monk scenario.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext c913a18a-c86a-4e04-b781-b6476a997995Cited by top-tier papers7
- Reinforcement Learning Gradients as Vitamin for Online Finetuning Decision TransformersKai Yan, Alexander G. Schwing, Yu-Xiong WangNeurIPS 2024 · 11 citations
- Rapidly Adapting Policies to the Real-World via Simulation-Guided Fine-TuningPatrick Yin, Tyler Westenbroek, Ching-An Cheng, Andrey Kolobov et al.ICLR 2025
- Efficient Online Reinforcement Learning Fine-Tuning Need Not Retain Offline DataZhiyuan Zhou, Andy Peng, Qiyang Li, Sergey Levine et al.ICLR 2025
- Craftium: Bridging Flexibility and Efficiency for Rich 3D Single- and Multi-Agent EnvironmentsMikel Malagón, Josu Ceberio, José Antonio LozanoICML 2025
- PaperBench: Evaluating AI's Ability to Replicate AI ResearchGiulio Starace, Oliver Jaffe, Dane Sherburn, James Aung et al.ICML 2025
Builds on29
- An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at ScaleAlexey Dosovitskiy, Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, Dirk Weissenborn et al.ICLR 2021 · 21,477 citations
- Offline Reinforcement Learning with Implicit Q-LearningIlya Kostrikov, Ashvin Nair, Sergey LevineICLR 2022 · 1,402 citations
- Decoupling Representation Learning from Reinforcement LearningAdam Stooke, Kimin Lee, Pieter Abbeel, Michael LaskinICML 2021 · 389 citations
- Efficient Online Reinforcement Learning with Offline DataPhilip J. Ball, Laura Smith, Ilya Kostrikov, Sergey LevineICML 2023 · 326 citations
- Multi-Game Decision TransformersKuang-Huei Lee, Ofir Nachum, Mengjiao Yang, Lisa Lee et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 279 citations
Related papers
- Learning to Modulate pre-trained Models in RLThomas Schmied, Markus Hofmarcher, Fabian Paischer, Razvan Pascanu et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 34 citations
- Understanding and Preventing Capacity Loss in Reinforcement LearningClare Lyle, Mark Rowland, Will DabneyICLR 2022 · 151 citations
- Retaining by Doing: The Role of On-Policy Data in Mitigating ForgettingHoward Chen, Noam Razin, Karthik Narasimhan, Danqi ChenICML 2026
- Pretrained Vision-Language-Action Models are Surprisingly Resistant to Forgetting in Continual LearningHuihan Liu, Changyeon Kim, Bo Liu, Minghuan Liu et al.ICML 2026 · 14 citations
- Reinforcement Fine-Tuning Naturally Mitigates Forgetting in Continual Post-TrainingSong Lai, Haohan Zhao, Rong Feng, Changyi Ma et al.ICML 2026 · 46 citations
