Understanding and Preventing Capacity Loss in Reinforcement Learning
Clare Lyle, Mark Rowland, Will Dabney
Abstract
The reinforcement learning (RL) problem is rife with sources of non-stationarity, making it a notoriously difficult problem domain for the application of neural networks. We identify a mechanism by which non-stationary prediction targets can prevent learning progress in deep RL agents: capacity loss, whereby networks trained on a sequence of target values lose their ability to quickly update their predictions over time. We demonstrate that capacity loss occurs in a range of RL agents and environments, and is particularly damaging to performance in sparse-reward tasks. We then present a simple regularizer, Initial Feature Regularization (InFeR), that mitigates this phenomenon by regressing a subspace of features towards its value at initialization, leading to significant performance improvements in sparse-reward environments such as Montezuma's Revenge. We conclude that preventing capacity loss is crucial to enable agents to maximally benefit from the learning signals they obtain throughout the entire training trajectory.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext cac89f64-6c27-4c62-920c-59622d48e273Cited by top-tier papers80
- The Primacy Bias in Deep Reinforcement LearningEvgenii Nikishin, Max Schwarzer, Pierluca D'Oro, Pierre-Luc Bacon et al.ICML 2022 · 269 citations
- Understanding Plasticity in Neural NetworksClare Lyle, Zeyu Zheng, Evgenii Nikishin, Bernardo Ávila Pires et al.ICML 2023 · 162 citations
- The Dormant Neuron Phenomenon in Deep Reinforcement LearningGhada Sokar, Rishabh Agarwal, Pablo Samuel Castro, Utku EvciICML 2023 · 153 citations
- For SALE: State-Action Representation Learning for Deep Reinforcement LearningScott Fujimoto, Wei-Di Chang, Edward J. Smith, Shixiang Gu et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 128 citations
- Stop Regressing: Training Value Functions via Classification for Scalable Deep RLJesse Farebrother, Jordi Orbay, Quan Vuong, Adrien Ali Taïga et al.ICML 2024 · 118 citations
Builds on7
- On Warm-Starting Neural Network TrainingJordan T. Ash, Ryan P. AdamsNeurIPS 2020 · 288 citations
- Implicit Under-Parameterization Inhibits Data-Efficient Deep Reinforcement LearningAviral Kumar, Rishabh Agarwal, Dibya Ghosh, Sergey LevineICLR 2021 · 155 citations
- Automatic Data Augmentation for Generalization in Reinforcement LearningRoberta Raileanu, Maxwell Goldstein, Denis Yarats, Ilya Kostrikov et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 143 citations
- Transient Non-stationarity and Generalisation in Deep Reinforcement LearningMaximilian Igl, Gregory Farquhar, Jelena Luketina, Wendelin Boehmer et al.ICLR 2021 · 104 citations
- The Value-Improvement Path: Towards Better Representations for Reinforcement LearningWill Dabney, André Barreto, Mark Rowland, Robert Dadashi et al.AAAI 2021 · 76 citations
Related papers
- No Representation, No Trust: Connecting Representation, Collapse, and Trust Issues in PPOSkander Moalla, Andrea Miele, Daniil Pyatko, Razvan Pascanu et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 35 citations
- A Study of Plasticity Loss in On-Policy Deep Reinforcement LearningArthur Juliani, Jordan T. AshNeurIPS 2024 · 37 citations
- Parseval Regularization for Continual Reinforcement LearningWesley Chung, Lynn Cherif, Doina Precup, David MegerNeurIPS 2024 · 27 citations
- Fine-tuning Reinforcement Learning Models is Secretly a Forgetting Mitigation ProblemMaciej Wolczyk, Bartlomiej Cupial, Mateusz Ostaszewski, Michal Bortkiewicz et al.ICML 2024 · 29 citations
- Learning Continually by Spectral RegularizationAlex Lewandowski, Michal Bortkiewicz, Saurabh Kumar, András György et al.ICLR 2025
