The Value-Improvement Path: Towards Better Representations for Reinforcement Learning
Will Dabney, André Barreto, Mark Rowland, Robert Dadashi, John Quan, Marc G. Bellemare, David Silver
Abstract
In value-based reinforcement learning (RL), unlike in supervised learning, the agent faces not a single, stationary, approximation problem, but a sequence of value prediction problems. Each time the policy improves, the nature of the problem changes, shifting both the distribution of states and their values. In this paper we take a novel perspective, arguing that the value prediction problems faced by an RL agent should not be addressed in isolation, but rather as a single, holistic, prediction problem. An RL algorithm generates a sequence of policies that, at least approximately, improve towards the optimal policy. We explicitly characterize the associated sequence of value functions and call it the value-improvement path. Our main idea is to approximate the value-improvement path holistically, rather than to solely track the value function of the current policy. Specifically, we discuss the impact that this holistic view of RL has on representation learning. We demonstrate that a representation that spans the past value-improvement path will also provide an accurate value approximation for future policy improvements. We use this insight to better understand existing approaches to auxiliary tasks and to propose new ones. To test our hypothesis empirically, we augmented a standard deep RL agent with an auxiliary task of learning the value-improvement path. In a study of Atari 2600 games, the augmented agent achieved approximately double the mean and median performance of the baseline agent.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 0c970deb-9dcd-4a46-91d7-400920ec31d6Cited by top-tier papers41
- The Primacy Bias in Deep Reinforcement LearningEvgenii Nikishin, Max Schwarzer, Pierluca D'Oro, Pierre-Luc Bacon et al.ICML 2022 · 269 citations
- Pretraining Representations for Data-Efficient Reinforcement LearningMax Schwarzer, Nitarshan Rajkumar, Michael Noukhovitch, Ankesh Anand et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 151 citations
- Understanding and Preventing Capacity Loss in Reinforcement LearningClare Lyle, Mark Rowland, Will DabneyICLR 2022 · 151 citations
- The Value Equivalence Principle for Model-Based Reinforcement LearningChristopher Grimm, André Barreto, Satinder Singh, David SilverNeurIPS 2020 · 129 citations
- Stop Regressing: Training Value Functions via Classification for Scalable Deep RLJesse Farebrother, Jordi Orbay, Quan Vuong, Adrien Ali Taïga et al.ICML 2024 · 118 citations
Related papers
- Value-driven Hindsight ModellingArthur Guez, Fabio Viola, Theophane Weber, Lars Buesing et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 12 citations
- Towards a better understanding of representation dynamics under TD-learningYunhao Tang, Rémi MunosICML 2023 · 3 citations
- Learning State Representations from Random Deep Action-conditional PredictionsZeyu Zheng, Vivek Veeriah, Risto Vuorio, Richard L. Lewis et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 6 citations
- Boosted Curriculum Reinforcement LearningPascal Klink, Carlo D'Eramo, Jan Peters, Joni PajarinenICLR 2022 · 11 citations
- Predictive auxiliary objectives in deep RL mimic learning in the brainChing Fang, Kim StachenfeldICLR 2024 · 16 citations
