Learning State Representations from Random Deep Action-conditional Predictions
Zeyu Zheng, Vivek Veeriah, Risto Vuorio, Richard L. Lewis, Satinder Singh
Abstract
Our main contribution in this work is an empirical finding that random General Value Functions (GVFs), i.e., deep action-conditional predictions -- random both in what feature of observations they predict as well as in the sequence of actions the predictions are conditioned upon -- form good auxiliary tasks for reinforcement learning (RL) problems. In particular, we show that random deep action-conditional predictions when used as auxiliary tasks yield state representations that produce control performance competitive with state-of-the-art hand-crafted auxiliary tasks like value prediction, pixel control, and CURL in both Atari and DeepMind Lab tasks. In another set of experiments we stop the gradients from the RL part of the network to the state representation learning part of the network and show, perhaps surprisingly, that the auxiliary tasks alone are sufficient to learn state representations good enough to outperform an end-to-end trained actor-critic baseline. We opensourced our code at https://github.com/Hwhitetooth/random_gvfs.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext c4a6f1ef-86fc-4f83-9834-ccc4fb1e9621Cited by top-tier papers4
- Foundation Policies with Hilbert RepresentationsSeohong Park, Tobias Kreiman, Sergey LevineICML 2024 · 72 citations
- Exploring through Random Curiosity with General Value FunctionsAditya A. Ramesh, Louis Kirsch, Sjoerd van Steenkiste, Jürgen SchmidhuberNeurIPS 2022 · 13 citations
- Towards a better understanding of representation dynamics under TD-learningYunhao Tang, Rémi MunosICML 2023 · 3 citations
- Learning Interpretable Options by Identifying Reward Diffusion Bottlenecks in Reinforcement LearningYiming Fei, Ziming Wang, Rui Yan, Huajin TangICML 2026
Builds on8
- CURL: Contrastive Unsupervised Representations for Reinforcement LearningMichael Laskin, Aravind Srinivas, Pieter AbbeelICML 2020 · 1,261 citations
- Mastering Atari with Discrete World ModelsDanijar Hafner, Timothy P. Lillicrap, Mohammad Norouzi, Jimmy BaICLR 2021 · 1,170 citations
- Data-Efficient Reinforcement Learning with Self-Predictive RepresentationsMax Schwarzer, Ankesh Anand, Rishab Goel, R. Devon Hjelm et al.ICLR 2021 · 399 citations
- Decoupling Representation Learning from Reinforcement LearningAdam Stooke, Kimin Lee, Pieter Abbeel, Michael LaskinICML 2021 · 389 citations
- Bootstrap Latent-Predictive Representations for Multitask Reinforcement LearningZhaohan Daniel Guo, Bernardo Ávila Pires, Bilal Piot, Jean-Bastien Grill et al.ICML 2020 · 153 citations
Related papers
- Discovering Object-Centric Generalized Value Functions From PixelsSomjit Nath, Gopeshh Raaj Subbaraj, Khimya Khetarpal, Samira Ebrahimi KahouICML 2023 · 2 citations
- The Value-Improvement Path: Towards Better Representations for Reinforcement LearningWill Dabney, André Barreto, Mark Rowland, Robert Dadashi et al.AAAI 2021 · 76 citations
- Deep Radial-Basis Value Functions for Continuous ControlKavosh Asadi, Neev Parikh, Ronald E. Parr, George Dimitri Konidaris et al.AAAI 2021 · 25 citations
- Bootstrapped Representations in Reinforcement LearningCharline Le Lan, Stephen Tu, Mark Rowland, Anna Harutyunyan et al.ICML 2023 · 12 citations
- Learning Task-relevant Representations for Generalization via Characteristic Functions of Reward Sequence DistributionsRui Yang, Jie Wang, Zijie Geng, Mingxuan Ye et al.KDD 2022 · 13 citations
