Understanding Forgetting in Continual Learning with Linear Regression
Meng Ding, Kaiyi Ji, Di Wang, Jinhui Xu
Abstract
Continual learning, focused on sequentially learning multiple tasks, has gained significant attention recently. Despite the tremendous progress made in the past, the theoretical understanding, especially factors contributing to catastrophic forgetting, remains relatively unexplored. In this paper, we provide a general theoretical analysis of forgetting in the linear regression model via Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) applicable to both underparameterized and overparameterized regimes. Our theoretical framework reveals some interesting insights into the intricate relationship between task sequence and algorithmic parameters, an aspect not fully captured in previous studies due to their restrictive assumptions. Specifically, we demonstrate that, given a sufficiently large data size, the arrangement of tasks in a sequence, where tasks with larger eigenvalues in their population data covariance matrices are trained later, tends to result in increased forgetting. Additionally, our findings highlight that an appropriate choice of step size will help mitigate forgetting in both underparameterized and overparameterized settings. To validate our theoretical analysis, we conducted simulation experiments on both linear regression models and Deep Neural Networks (DNNs). Results from these simulations substantiate our theoretical findings.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 8c4e6f22-74ec-4d13-99ff-a841d58099d7Cited by top-tier papers15
- Demystifying Language Model Forgetting with Low-rank Example AssociationsXisen Jin, Xiang RenNeurIPS 2025 · 9 citations
- Revisiting Differentially Private ReLU RegressionMeng Ding, Mingxi Lei, Liyang Zhu, Shaowei Wang et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 7 citations
- Are Greedy Task Orderings Better Than Random in Continual Linear Regression?Matan Tsipory, Ran Levinstein, Itay Evron, Mark Kong et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 5 citations
- Compact Memory for Continual Logistic RegressionYohan Jung, Hyungi Lee, Wenlong Chen, Thomas Möllenhoff et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations
- Benign Overfitting in Adversarial Training for Vision TransformersJiaming Zhang, Meng Ding, Shaopeng Fu, Jingfeng Zhang et al.ICML 2026 · 1 citation
Builds on10
- Gradient Projection Memory for Continual LearningGobinda Saha, Isha Garg, Kaushik RoyICLR 2021 · 409 citations
- Scalable and Order-robust Continual Learning with Additive Parameter DecompositionJaehong Yoon, Saehoon Kim, Eunho Yang, Sung Ju HwangICLR 2020 · 206 citations
- Continual Learning in the Teacher-Student Setup: Impact of Task SimilaritySebastian Lee, Sebastian Goldt, Andrew M. SaxeICML 2021 · 98 citations
- Theory on Forgetting and Generalization of Continual LearningSen Lin, Peizhong Ju, Yingbin Liang, Ness B. ShroffICML 2023 · 74 citations
- Continual Learning with Recursive Gradient OptimizationHao Liu, Huaping LiuICLR 2022 · 52 citations
Related papers
- The Joint Effect of Task Similarity and Overparameterization on Catastrophic Forgetting - An Analytical ModelDaniel Goldfarb, Itay Evron, Nir Weinberger, Daniel Soudry et al.ICLR 2024 · 25 citations
- Unlocking the Power of Rehearsal in Continual Learning: A Theoretical PerspectiveJunze Deng, Qinhang Wu, Peizhong Ju, Sen Lin et al.ICML 2025
- Towards Understanding Catastrophic Forgetting in Two-layer Convolutional Neural NetworksBoqi Li, Youjun Wang, Weiwei LiuICML 2025
- Memory-Statistics Tradeoff in Continual Learning with Structural RegularizationHaoran Li, Jingfeng Wu, Vladimir BravermanICLR 2026 · 4 citations
- Understanding the Role of Training Regimes in Continual LearningSeyed-Iman Mirzadeh, Mehrdad Farajtabar, Razvan Pascanu, Hassan GhasemzadehNeurIPS 2020 · 295 citations
