Demystifying Language Model Forgetting with Low-rank Example Associations
Xisen Jin, Xiang Ren
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) suffer from forgetting of upstream knowledge when fine-tuned. Despite efforts on mitigating forgetting, few have investigated how forgotten upstream examples are dependent on newly learned tasks. Insights on such dependencies enable efficient and targeted mitigation of forgetting. In this paper, we empirically analyze forgetting that occurs in upstream examples of language modeling or instruction-tuning after fine-tuning LLMs on one of new tasks, visualized in matrices. We show that the matrices are often well-approximated with low-rank matrices, indicating the dominance of simple associations between the learned tasks and forgotten upstream examples. Leveraging the analysis, we predict forgetting of upstream examples when fine-tuning LLMs on unseen tasks with matrix completion over the empirical associations. This enables fast identification of most forgotten examples without expensive inference on the entire upstream data. Despite simplicity, the approach outperforms prior approaches that learn semantic relationships of learned tasks and upstream examples with LMs. We demonstrate the practical utility of our analysis by showing statistically significantly reduced forgetting as we upweight predicted examples for replay during fine-tuning. Code, data, and statistics collected: https://github.com/AuCson/low-rank-forgetting
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 9990792b-14c8-45cb-a006-d5e2eab67b31Cited by top-tier papers2
- Massive Supervised Fine-tuning Experiments Reveal How Data, Layer, and Training Factors Shape LLM Alignment QualityYuto Harada, Yusuke Yamauchi, Yusuke Oda, Yohei Oseki et al.EMNLP 2025
- Adversarial Latent Embedding Repair for LLM Continual LearningXilin Xia, Xialiang Tong, Jie Wang, Chi Ma et al.ICML 2026
Builds on34
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human FalsehoodsStephanie Lin, Jacob Hilton, Owain EvansACL 2022 · 3,228 citations
- Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and ScalingStella Biderman, Hailey Schoelkopf, Quentin Gregory Anthony, Herbie Bradley et al.ICML 2023 · 1,822 citations
- Dark Experience for General Continual Learning: a Strong, Simple BaselinePietro Buzzega, Matteo Boschini, Angelo Porrello, Davide Abati et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 1,494 citations
- The Flan Collection: Designing Data and Methods for Effective Instruction TuningShayne Longpre, Le Hou, Tu Vu, Albert Webson et al.ICML 2023 · 908 citations
Related papers
- Retaining by Doing: The Role of On-Policy Data in Mitigating ForgettingHoward Chen, Noam Razin, Karthik Narasimhan, Danqi ChenICML 2026
- What Will My Model Forget? Forecasting Forgotten Examples in Language Model RefinementXisen Jin, Xiang RenICML 2024 · 8 citations
- Why Supervised Fine-Tuning Fails to Learn: A Systematic Study of Incomplete Learning in Large Language ModelsChao Xue, Yao Wang, Mengqiao Liu, Di Liang et al.ACL 2026 · 5 citations
- LoRAMoE: Alleviating World Knowledge Forgetting in Large Language Models via MoE-Style PluginShihan Dou, Enyu Zhou, Yan Liu, Songyang Gao et al.ACL 2024 · 41 citations
- HFT: Half Fine-Tuning for Large Language ModelsTingfeng Hui, Zhenyu Zhang, Shuohuan Wang, Weiran Xu et al.ACL 2025
