Massive Supervised Fine-tuning Experiments Reveal How Data, Layer, and Training Factors Shape LLM Alignment Quality
Yuto Harada, Yusuke Yamauchi, Yusuke Oda, Yohei Oseki, Yusuke Miyao, Yu Takagi
Abstract
Supervised fine-tuning (SFT) is a critical step in aligning large language models (LLMs) with human instructions and values, yet many aspects of SFT remain poorly understood. We trained a wide range of base models on a variety of datasets including code generation, mathematical reasoning, and general-domain tasks, resulting in 1,000+ SFT models under controlled conditions. We then identified the dataset properties that matter most and examined the layer-wise modifications introduced by SFT. Our findings reveal that some training-task synergies persist across all models while others vary substantially, emphasizing the importance of model-specific strategies. Moreover, we demonstrate that perplexity consistently predicts SFT effectiveness, often surpassing superficial similarity between the training data and the benchmark, and that mid-layer weight changes correlate most strongly with performance gains. We release these 1,000+ SFT models and benchmark results to accelerate further research. All resources are available at https://github. com/llm-jp/massive-sft .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 996deba3-e237-4393-8e46-ef983123fd21Cited by top-tier papers3
- Quantifying Large Language Model Attacks Through the Lens of Model CognitionXiuming Liu, Chaoxiang He, Xuanran Yu, Jichen Chai et al.USENIX Security 2026
- TuneAhead: Predicting Fine-tuning Performance Before Training BeginsYuxiang Luo, Haonan Long, Chen Wang, Qiqi Duan et al.ICML 2026
- Uncovering Hidden Triggers: Backdoor Attribution in Language ModelsMiao Yu, Zhenhong Zhou, Moayad Aloqaily, Kun Wang et al.ICML 2026
Builds on11
- LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language ModelsEdward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu et al.ICLR 2022 · 18,833 citations
- QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMsTim Dettmers, Artidoro Pagnoni, Ari Holtzman, Luke ZettlemoyerNeurIPS 2023 · 5,863 citations
- TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human FalsehoodsStephanie Lin, Jacob Hilton, Owain EvansACL 2022 · 3,228 citations
- FlashAttention-2: Faster Attention with Better Parallelism and Work PartitioningTri DaoICLR 2024 · 2,600 citations
- LIMA: Less Is More for AlignmentChunting Zhou, Pengfei Liu, Puxin Xu, Srinivasan Iyer et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 1,486 citations
Related papers
- The Emperor's New Reasoning: Format Imitation Overshadows Genuine Mathematical Understanding in SFTLinyao Yang, Jian-Tao Huang, Yafei Lu, Zhenhui Jessie Li et al.EMNLP 2025
- How Abilities in Large Language Models are Affected by Supervised Fine-tuning Data CompositionGuanting Dong, Hongyi Yuan, Keming Lu, Chengpeng Li et al.ACL 2024 · 39 citations
- On the Generalization of SFT: A Reinforcement Learning Perspective with Reward RectificationYongliang Wu, Yizhou Zhou, Ziheng Zhou, Yingzhe Peng et al.ICLR 2026 · 130 citations
- From Yes-Men to Truth-Tellers: Addressing Sycophancy in Large Language Models with Pinpoint TuningWei Chen, Zhen Huang, Liang Xie, Binbin Lin et al.ICML 2024 · 55 citations
- Layer by Layer: Uncovering Where Multi-Task Learning Happens in Instruction-Tuned Large Language ModelsZheng Zhao, Yftah Ziser, Shay B. CohenEMNLP 2024
