From Yes-Men to Truth-Tellers: Addressing Sycophancy in Large Language Models with Pinpoint Tuning
Wei Chen, Zhen Huang, Liang Xie, Binbin Lin, Houqiang Li, Le Lu, Xinmei Tian, Deng Cai, Yonggang Zhang, Wenxiao Wang, Xu Shen, Jieping Ye
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) tend to prioritize adherence to user prompts over providing veracious responses, leading to the sycophancy issue. When challenged by users, LLMs tend to admit mistakes and provide inaccurate responses even if they initially provided the correct answer. Recent works propose to employ supervised fine-tuning (SFT) to mitigate the sycophancy issue, while it typically leads to the degeneration of LLMs' general capability. To address the challenge, we propose a novel supervised pinpoint tuning (SPT), where the region-of-interest modules are tuned for a given objective. Specifically, SPT first reveals and verifies a small percentage (< 5%) of the basic modules, which significantly affect a particular behavior of LLMs. i.e., sycophancy. Subsequently, SPT merely fine-tunes these identified modules while freezing the rest. To verify the effectiveness of the proposed SPT, we conduct comprehensive experiments, demonstrating that SPT significantly mitigates the sycophancy issue of LLMs (even better than SFT). Moreover, SPT introduces limited or even no side effects on the general capability of LLMs. Our results shed light on how to precisely, effectively, and efficiently explain and improve the targeted ability of LLMs. Code and data are available at https://github.com/yellowtownhz/sycophancyinterpretability .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 65b9dae8-270c-414d-a193-c4ac2e4c3ec9Cited by top-tier papers17
- The Personality Illusion: Revealing Dissociation Between Self-Reports & Behavior in LLMsPengrui Han, Rafal Kocielnik, Peiyang Song, Ramit Debnath et al.ICML 2026 · 33 citations
- When Truth Is Overridden: Uncovering the Internal Origins of Sycophancy in Large Language ModelsKeyu Wang, Jin Li, Shu Yang, Zhuoran Zhang et al.AAAI 2026 · 25 citations
- Auditing Meta-Cognitive Hallucinations in Reasoning Large Language ModelsHaolang Lu, Yilian Liu, Jingxin Xu, Guoshun Nan et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 23 citations
- How RLHF Amplifies SycophancyItai Shapira, Gerdus Benade, Ariel ProcacciaICML 2026 · 16 citations
- Invisible Saboteurs: Sycophantic LLMs Mislead Novices in Problem-Solving TasksJessica Y. Bo, Majeed Kazemitabaar, Mengqing Deng, Michael Inzlicht et al.CHI 2026 · 8 citations
Builds on17
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language ModelsEdward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu et al.ICLR 2022 · 18,833 citations
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
Related papers
- Pointing to a Llama and Call it a Camel: On the Sycophancy of Multimodal Large Language ModelsRenjie Pi, Kehao Miao, Li Peihang, Runtao Liu et al.EMNLP 2025 · 1 citation
- Massive Supervised Fine-tuning Experiments Reveal How Data, Layer, and Training Factors Shape LLM Alignment QualityYuto Harada, Yusuke Yamauchi, Yusuke Oda, Yohei Oseki et al.EMNLP 2025
- Have the VLMs Lost Confidence? A Study of Sycophancy in VLMsShuo Li, Tao Ji, Xiaoran Fan, Linsheng Lu et al.ICLR 2025
- Safety-Tuned LLaMAs: Lessons From Improving the Safety of Large Language Models that Follow InstructionsFederico Bianchi, Mirac Suzgun, Giuseppe Attanasio, Paul Röttger et al.ICLR 2024 · 373 citations
- Confidence v.s. Critique: A Decomposition of Self-Correction Capability for LLMsZhe Yang, Yichang Zhang, Yudong Wang, Ziyao Xu et al.ACL 2025
