Optimal Rates in Continual Linear Regression via Increasing Regularization
Ran Levinstein, Amit Attia, Matan Schliserman, Uri Sherman, Daniel Soudry, Tomer Koren, Itay Evron
Abstract
We study realizable continual linear regression under random task orderings, a common setting for developing continual learning theory. In this setup, the worst-case expected loss after learning iterations admits a lower bound of . However, prior work using an unregularized scheme has only established an upper bound of , leaving a significant gap. Our paper proves that this gap can be narrowed, or even closed, using two frequently used regularization schemes: (1) explicit isotropic regularization, and (2) implicit regularization via finite step budgets. We show that these approaches, which are used in practice to mitigate forgetting, reduce to stochastic gradient descent (SGD) on carefully defined surrogate losses. Through this lens, we identify a fixed regularization strength that yields a near-optimal rate of . Moreover, formalizing and analyzing a generalized variant of SGD for time-varying functions, we derive an increasing regularization strength schedule that provably achieves an optimal rate of . This suggests that schedules that increase the regularization coefficient or decrease the number of steps per task are beneficial, at least in the worst case.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 06f5de7a-5378-47b9-a185-e728b1ecd561Cited by top-tier papers3
- Fast Last-Iterate Convergence of SGD in the Smooth Interpolation RegimeAmit Attia, Matan Schliserman, Uri Sherman, Tomer KorenNeurIPS 2025 · 18 citations
- Are Greedy Task Orderings Better Than Random in Continual Linear Regression?Matan Tsipory, Ran Levinstein, Itay Evron, Mark Kong et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 5 citations
- PAC-Bayes bounds for cumulative loss in Continual LearningLior Friedman, Ron MeirICLR 2026
Builds on10
- Understanding the Role of Training Regimes in Continual LearningSeyed-Iman Mirzadeh, Mehrdad Farajtabar, Razvan Pascanu, Hassan GhasemzadehNeurIPS 2020 · 295 citations
- Theory on Forgetting and Generalization of Continual LearningSen Lin, Peizhong Ju, Yingbin Liang, Ness B. ShroffICML 2023 · 74 citations
- Last iterate convergence of SGD for Least-Squares in the Interpolation regimeAditya Vardhan Varre, Loucas Pillaud-Vivien, Nicolas FlammarionNeurIPS 2021 · 52 citations
- A Statistical Theory of Regularization-Based Continual LearningXuyang Zhao, Huiyuan Wang, Weiran Huang, Wei LinICML 2024 · 40 citations
- The Ideal Continual Learner: An Agent That Never ForgetsLiangzu Peng, Paris Giampouras, René VidalICML 2023 · 39 citations
Related papers
- Understanding Forgetting in Continual Learning with Linear RegressionMeng Ding, Kaiyi Ji, Di Wang, Jinhui XuICML 2024 · 23 citations
- Continual Learning in Linear Classification on Separable DataItay Evron, Edward Moroshko, Gon Buzaglo, Maroun Khriesh et al.ICML 2023 · 32 citations
- Memory-Statistics Tradeoff in Continual Learning with Structural RegularizationHaoran Li, Jingfeng Wu, Vladimir BravermanICLR 2026 · 4 citations
- Last Iterate Convergence of Incremental Methods as a Model of ForgettingXufeng Cai, Jelena DiakonikolasICLR 2025
- Understanding the Dynamics of Forgetting and Generalization in Continual Learning via the Neural Tangent KernelGuodong Zheng, Peng Wang, Shengchao Hu, Quan Zheng et al.ICLR 2026
