Inductive biases of multi-task learning and finetuning: multiple regimes of feature reuse
Samuel Lippl, Jack W. Lindsey
Abstract
Neural networks are often trained on multiple tasks, either simultaneously (multi-task learning, MTL) or sequentially (pretraining and subsequent finetuning, PT+FT). In particular, it is common practice to pretrain neural networks on a large auxiliary task before finetuning on a downstream task with fewer samples. Despite the prevalence of this approach, the inductive biases that arise from learning multiple tasks are poorly characterized. In this work, we address this gap. We describe novel implicit regularization penalties associated with MTL and PT+FT in diagonal linear networks and single-hidden-layer ReLU networks. These penalties indicate that MTL and PT+FT induce the network to reuse features in different ways. 1) Both MTL and PT+FT exhibit biases towards feature reuse between tasks, and towards sparsity in the set of learned features. We show a"conservation law"that implies a direct tradeoff between these two biases. 2) PT+FT exhibits a novel"nested feature selection"regime, not described by either the"lazy"or"rich"regimes identified in prior work, which biases it to rely on a sparse subset of the features learned during pretraining. This regime is much narrower for MTL. 3) PT+FT (but not MTL) in ReLU networks benefits from features that are correlated between the auxiliary and main task. We confirm these findings empirically with teacher-student models, and introduce a technique -- weight rescaling following pretraining -- that can elicit the nested feature selection regime. Finally, we validate our theory in deep neural networks trained on image classification. We find that weight rescaling improves performance when it causes models to display signatures of nested feature selection. Our results suggest that nested feature selection may be an important inductive bias for finetuning neural networks.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 1f693dfa-6553-4c29-9a92-995065af25ffCited by top-tier papers6
- Neural Collapse in Multi-Task LearningYoujun Wang, Boqi Li, Xin Zou, Weiwei LiuICLR 2026 · 16 citations
- A Survey of Inductive Reasoning for Large Language ModelsKedi Chen, Dezhao Ruan, Yuhao Dan, Yaoting Wang et al.ACL 2026 · 5 citations
- A New Neural Kernel Regime: The Inductive Bias of Multi-Task LearningJulia B. Nakhleh, Joseph Shenouda, Robert D. NowakNeurIPS 2024 · 3 citations
- A Theory of How Pretraining Shapes Inductive Bias in Fine-TuningNicolas Anguita, Francesco Locatello, Andrew Saxe, Marco Mondelli et al.ICML 2026 · 3 citations
- A Bayesian Model Selection Criterion for Selecting Pretraining CheckpointsMichael Munn, Susan WeiICML 2025
Builds on11
- An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at ScaleAlexey Dosovitskiy, Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, Dirk Weissenborn et al.ICLR 2021 · 21,477 citations
- Gradient Descent Maximizes the Margin of Homogeneous Neural NetworksKaifeng Lyu, Jian LiICLR 2020 · 402 citations
- Understanding and Improving Information Transfer in Multi-Task LearningSen Wu, Hongyang R. Zhang, Christopher RéICLR 2020 · 183 citations
- Implicit Regularization in Deep Learning May Not Be Explainable by NormsNoam Razin, Nadav CohenNeurIPS 2020 · 178 citations
- A Function Space View of Bounded Norm Infinite Width ReLU Nets: The Multivariate CaseGreg Ongie, Rebecca Willett, Daniel Soudry, Nathan SrebroICLR 2020 · 172 citations
Related papers
- Provable Multi-Task Representation Learning by Two-Layer ReLU Neural NetworksLiam Collins, Hamed Hassani, Mahdi Soltanolkotabi, Aryan Mokhtari et al.ICML 2024 · 15 citations
- Tailoring: encoding inductive biases by optimizing unsupervised objectives at prediction timeFerran Alet, Maria Bauzá, Kenji Kawaguchi, Nurullah Giray Kuru et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 18 citations
- A Theoretical Analysis of Fine-tuning with Linear TeachersGal Shachaf, Alon Brutzkus, Amir GlobersonNeurIPS 2021 · 23 citations
- Transfer Learning in Infinite Width Feature Learning NetworksClarissa Lauditi, Blake Bordelon, Cengiz PehlevanICLR 2026 · 2 citations
- On Plasticity, Invariance, and Mutually Frozen Weights in Sequential Task LearningJulian G. Zilly, Alessandro Achille, Andrea Censi, Emilio FrazzoliNeurIPS 2021 · 18 citations
