A Theory of How Pretraining Shapes Inductive Bias in Fine-Tuning
Nicolas Anguita, Francesco Locatello, Andrew Saxe, Marco Mondelli, Flavia Mancini, Samuel Lippl, Clémentine Dominé
Abstract
Pretraining and fine-tuning are central stages in modern machine learning systems. In practice, feature learning plays an important role across both stages: deep neural networks learn a broad range of useful features during pretraining and further refine those features during fine-tuning. However, an end-to-end theoretical understanding of how choices of initialization impact the ability to reuse and refine features during fine-tuning has remained elusive. Here we develop an analytical theory of the pretraining–fine-tuning pipeline in diagonal linear networks, deriving exact expressions for the generalization error as a function of initialization parameters and task statistics. We find that different initialization choices place the network into four distinct fine-tuning regimes that are distinguished by their ability to support feature learning and reuse—and therefore by the task statistics for which they are beneficial. In particular, a smaller initialization scale in earlier layers enables the network to both reuse and refine its features, leading to superior generalization on fine-tuning tasks that rely on a subset of pretraining features. We demonstrate empirically that the same initialization parameters impact generalization in ResNets trained on CIFAR-100 and SVHN as well as Transformers trained on modular arithmetic tasks. Overall, our results demonstrate analytically how data and network initialization interact to shape fine-tuning generalization, highlighting an important role for the relative scale of initialization across different layers in enabling continued feature learning during fine-tuning.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext bffbaf91-6766-4237-bd75-28547fa7d11dBuilds on21
- Fine-Tuning can Distort Pretrained Features and Underperform Out-of-DistributionAnanya Kumar, Aditi Raghunathan, Robbie Matthew Jones, Tengyu Ma et al.ICLR 2022 · 911 citations
- Gradient Descent Maximizes the Margin of Homogeneous Neural NetworksKaifeng Lyu, Jian LiICLR 2020 · 402 citations
- Deep learning versus kernel learning: an empirical study of loss landscape geometry and the time evolution of the Neural Tangent KernelStanislav Fort, Gintare Karolina Dziugaite, Mansheej Paul, Sepideh Kharaghani et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 255 citations
- Implicit Bias of SGD for Diagonal Linear Networks: a Provable Benefit of StochasticityScott Pesme, Loucas Pillaud-Vivien, Nicolas FlammarionNeurIPS 2021 · 135 citations
- A Kernel-Based View of Language Model Fine-TuningSadhika Malladi, Alexander Wettig, Dingli Yu, Danqi Chen et al.ICML 2023 · 111 citations
Related papers
- Inductive biases of multi-task learning and finetuning: multiple regimes of feature reuseSamuel Lippl, Jack W. LindseyNeurIPS 2024 · 13 citations
- Features are fate: a theory of transfer learning in high-dimensional regressionJavan Tahir, Surya Ganguli, Grant M. RotskoffICML 2025
- Transfer Learning in Infinite Width Feature Learning NetworksClarissa Lauditi, Blake Bordelon, Cengiz PehlevanICLR 2026 · 2 citations
- How to prepare your task head for finetuningYi Ren, Shangmin Guo, Wonho Bae, Danica J. SutherlandICLR 2023 · 3 citations
- A Theoretical Analysis of Fine-tuning with Linear TeachersGal Shachaf, Alon Brutzkus, Amir GlobersonNeurIPS 2021 · 23 citations
