On Plasticity, Invariance, and Mutually Frozen Weights in Sequential Task Learning
Julian G. Zilly, Alessandro Achille, Andrea Censi, Emilio Frazzoli
Abstract
Plastic neural networks have the ability to adapt to new tasks. However, in a continual learning setting, the configuration of parameters learned in previous tasks can severely reduce the adaptability to future tasks. In particular, we show that, when using weight decay, weights in successive layers of a deep network may become "mutually frozen". This has a double effect: on the one hand, it makes the network updates more invariant to nuisance factors, providing a useful bias for future tasks. On the other hand, it can prevent the network from learning new tasks that require significantly different features. In this context, we find that the local input sensitivity of a deep model is correlated with its ability to adapt, thus leading to an intriguing trade-off between adaptability and invariance when training a deep model more than once. We then show that a simple intervention that "resets" the mutually frozen connections can improve transfer learning on a variety of visual classification tasks. The efficacy of "resetting" itself depends on the size of the target dataset and the difference of the pre-training and target domains, allowing us to achieve state-of-the-art results on some datasets.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext e703db7b-fba8-45e1-bb0f-bcbde679ce38Cited by top-tier papers6
- Slow and Steady Wins the Race: Maintaining Plasticity with Hare and Tortoise NetworksHojoon Lee, Hyeonseo Cho, Hyunseung Kim, Donghu Kim et al.ICML 2024 · 36 citations
- Identifying Equivalent Training DynamicsWilliam T. Redman, Juan M. Bello-Rivas, Maria Fonoberova, Ryan Mohr et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 15 citations
- Activation Function Design Sustains Plasticity in Continual LearningLute Lillo, Nick CheneyICLR 2026 · 6 citations
- Data Heterogeneity and Forgotten Labels in Split Federated LearningJoana Tirana, Dimitra Tsigkari, David Solans Noguero, Nicolas KourtellisAAAI 2026 · 3 citations
- GRAM: A Generative Foundation Reward Model for Reward GeneralizationChenglong Wang, Yang Gan, Yifu Huo, Yongyu Mu et al.ICML 2025
Builds on3
- Task2Vec: Task Embedding for Meta-LearningAlessandro Achille, Michael Lam, Rahul Tewari, Avinash Ravichandran et al.ICCV 2019 · 359 citations
- The Generalization-Stability Tradeoff In Neural Network PruningBrian R. Bartoldson, Ari S. Morcos, Adrian Barbu, Gordon ErlebacherNeurIPS 2020 · 97 citations
- Bad Global Minima Exist and SGD Can Reach ThemShengchao Liu, Dimitris S. Papailiopoulos, Dimitris AchlioptasNeurIPS 2020 · 89 citations
Related papers
- Continual Learning in the Teacher-Student Setup: Impact of Task SimilaritySebastian Lee, Sebastian Goldt, Andrew M. SaxeICML 2021 · 98 citations
- Continual Learning with Adaptive Weights (CLAW)Tameem Adel, Han Zhao, Richard E. TurnerICLR 2020 · 79 citations
- Bayesian Structural Adaptation for Continual LearningAbhishek Kumar, Sunabha Chatterjee, Piyush RaiICML 2021 · 7 citations
- Achieving a Better Stability-Plasticity Trade-off via Auxiliary Networks in Continual LearningSanghwan Kim, Lorenzo Noci, Antonio Orvieto, Thomas HofmannCVPR 2023
- Disentangling and mitigating the impact of task similarity for continual learningNaoki HirataniNeurIPS 2024 · 21 citations
