Rényi Fair Inference
Sina Baharlouei, Maher Nouiehed, Ahmad Beirami, Meisam Razaviyayn
Abstract
Machine learning algorithms have been increasingly deployed in critical automated decision-making systems that directly affect human lives. When these algorithms are solely trained to minimize the training/test error, they could suffer from systematic discrimination against individuals based on their sensitive attributes, such as gender or race. Recently, there has been a surge in machine learning society to develop algorithms for fair machine learning. In particular, several adversarial learning procedures have been proposed to impose fairness. Unfortunately, these algorithms either can only impose fairness up to linear dependence between the variables, or they lack computational convergence guarantees. In this paper, we use Rényi correlation as a measure of fairness of machine learning models and develop a general training framework to impose fairness. In particular, we propose a min-max formulation which balances the accuracy and fairness when solved to optimality. For the case of discrete sensitive attributes, we suggest an iterative algorithm with theoretical convergence guarantee for solving the proposed min-max problem. Our algorithm and analysis are then specialized to fair classification and fair clustering problems. To demonstrate the performance of the proposed Rényi fair inference framework in practice, we compare it with wellknown existing methods on several benchmark datasets. Experiments indicate that the proposed method has favorable empirical performance against state-of-the-art approaches.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 1ed4ff94-def3-4f77-8d60-14a13de1b4e2Cited by top-tier papers19
- Fair Resource Allocation in Federated LearningTian Li, Maziar Sanjabi, Ahmad Beirami, Virginia SmithICLR 2020 · 971 citations
- Individual Fairness for k-ClusteringSepideh Mahabadi, Ali VakilianICML 2020 · 99 citations
- FFB: A Fair Fairness Benchmark for In-Processing Group Fairness MethodsXiaotian Han, Jianfeng Chi, Yu Chen, Qifan Wang et al.ICLR 2024 · 48 citations
- Understanding Instance-Level Impact of Fairness ConstraintsJialu Wang, Xin Eric Wang, Yang LiuICML 2022 · 41 citations
- Fair Selective Classification Via SufficiencyJoshua K. Lee, Yuheng Bu, Deepta Rajan, Prasanna Sattigeri et al.ICML 2021 · 33 citations
Related papers
- Stochastic Differentially Private and Fair LearningAndrew Lowy, Devansh Gupta, Meisam RazaviyaynICLR 2023 · 1 citation
- Empirical Likelihood for Fair ClassificationPangpang Liu, Yichuan ZhaoICLR 2024 · 1 citation
- Learning fair representation with a parametric integral probability metricDongha Kim, Kunwoong Kim, Insung Kong, Ilsang Ohn et al.ICML 2022 · 23 citations
- Fairness via Independence: A General Regularization Framework for Machine LearningYezi Liu, Hanning Chen, Wenjun Huang, Yang Ni et al.ICLR 2026
- Fair Model-based ClusteringJinwon Park, Kunwoong Kim, Jihu Lee, Yongdai KimAAAI 2026
