Learning fair representation with a parametric integral probability metric
Dongha Kim, Kunwoong Kim, Insung Kong, Ilsang Ohn, Yongdai Kim
Abstract
As they have a vital effect on social decision-making, AI algorithms should be not only accurate but also fair. Among various algorithms for fairness AI, learning fair representation (LFR), whose goal is to find a fair representation with respect to sensitive variables such as gender and race, has received much attention. For LFR, the adversarial training scheme is popularly employed as is done in the generative adversarial network type algorithms. The choice of a discriminator, however, is done heuristically without justifica-tion. In this paper, we propose a new adversarial training scheme for LFR, where the integral probability metric (IPM) with a specific parametric family of discriminators is used. The most notable result of the proposed LFR algorithm is its theoretical guarantee about the fairness of the final prediction model, which has not been considered yet. That is, we derive theoretical relations between the fairness of representation and the fairness of the prediction model built on the top of the representation (i.e., using the representation as the input). Moreover, by numerical experiments, we show that our proposed LFR algorithm is computationally lighter and more stable, and the final prediction model is competitive or superior to other LFR algorithms using more complex discriminators.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 299014e5-a4c5-433b-b14d-9a0275372117Cited by top-tier papers11
- FARE: Provably Fair Representation Learning with Practical CertificatesNikola Jovanovic, Mislav Balunovic, Dimitar Iliev Dimitrov, Martin T. VechevICML 2023 · 21 citations
- Covariate balancing using the integral probability metric for causal inferenceInsung Kong, Yuha Park, Joonhyuk Jung, Kwonsang Lee et al.ICML 2023 · 9 citations
- FedFACT: A Provable Framework for Controllable Group-Fairness Calibration in Federated LearningLi Zhang, Zhongxuan Han, Xiaohua Feng, Jiaming Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations
- Efficient Fairness-Performance Pareto Front ComputationMark Kozdoba, Binyamin Perets, Shie MannorNeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations
- Doubly-Regressing Approach for Subgroup FairnessKunwoong Kim, Kyungseon Lee, Jihu Lee, Dongyoon Yang et al.ICLR 2026 · 1 citation
Builds on6
- Retiring Adult: New Datasets for Fair Machine LearningFrances Ding, Moritz Hardt, John Miller, Ludwig SchmidtNeurIPS 2021 · 671 citations
- Learning Certified Individually Fair RepresentationsAnian Ruoss, Mislav Balunovic, Marc Fischer, Martin T. VechevNeurIPS 2020 · 112 citations
- Two Simple Ways to Learn Individual Fairness Metrics from DataDebarghya Mukherjee, Mikhail Yurochkin, Moulinath Banerjee, Yuekai SunICML 2020 · 109 citations
- Algorithmic Decision Making with Conditional FairnessRenzhe Xu, Peng Cui, Kun Kuang, Bo Li et al.KDD 2020 · 26 citations
- Fair Mixup: Fairness via InterpolationChing-Yao Chuang, Youssef MrouehICLR 2021 · 11 citations
Related papers
- Rényi Fair InferenceSina Baharlouei, Maher Nouiehed, Ahmad Beirami, Meisam RazaviyaynICLR 2020 · 69 citations
- Fair Representation Learning with Controllable High Confidence Guarantees via Adversarial InferenceYuhong Luo, Austin Hoag, Xintong Wang, Philip S. Thomas et al.NeurIPS 2025
- Constructing a Fair Classifier with Generated Fair DataTaeuk Jang, Feng Zheng, Xiaoqian WangAAAI 2021 · 44 citations
- Towards Poisoning Fair RepresentationsTianci Liu, Haoyu Wang, Feijie Wu, Hengtong Zhang et al.ICLR 2024 · 3 citations
- Kernel-based Equalized Odds: A Quantification of Accuracy-Fairness Trade-off in Fair Representation LearningYijin Ni, Xiaoming HuoNeurIPS 2025
