Understanding Instance-Level Impact of Fairness Constraints
Jialu Wang, Xin Eric Wang, Yang Liu
Abstract
A variety of fairness constraints have been proposed in the literature to mitigate group-level statistical bias. Their impacts have been largely evaluated for different groups of populations corresponding to a set of sensitive attributes, such as race or gender. Nonetheless, the community has not observed sufficient explorations for how imposing fairness constraints fare at an instance level. Building on the concept of influence function, a measure that characterizes the impact of a training example on the target model and its predictive performance, this work studies the influence of training examples when fairness constraints are imposed. We find out that under certain assumptions, the influence function with respect to fairness constraints can be decomposed into a kernelized combination of training examples. One promising application of the proposed fairness influence function is to identify suspicious training examples that may cause model discrimination by ranking their influence scores. We demonstrate with extensive experiments that training on a subset of weighty data examples leads to lower fairness violations with a trade-off of accuracy.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 6b3076ea-054f-403b-b01f-c324210d2feeCited by top-tier papers14
- Model Sparsity Can Simplify Machine UnlearningJinghan Jia, Jiancheng Liu, Parikshit Ram, Yuguang Yao et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 293 citations
- Detecting Corrupted Labels Without Training a Model to PredictZhaowei Zhu, Zihao Dong, Yang LiuICML 2022 · 84 citations
- Beyond Images: Label Noise Transition Matrix Estimation for Tasks with Lower-Quality FeaturesZhaowei Zhu, Jialu Wang, Yang LiuICML 2022 · 43 citations
- Most Influential Subset Selection: Challenges, Promises, and BeyondYuzheng Hu, Pingbang Hu, Han Zhao, Jiaqi W. MaNeurIPS 2024 · 39 citations
- Weak Proxies are Sufficient and Preferable for Fairness with Missing Sensitive AttributesZhaowei Zhu, Yuanshun Yao, Jiankai Sun, Hang Li et al.ICML 2023 · 28 citations
Builds on15
- Deep Learning on a Data Diet: Finding Important Examples Early in TrainingMansheej Paul, Surya Ganguli, Gintare Karolina DziugaiteNeurIPS 2021 · 806 citations
- The Many Shapley Values for Model ExplanationMukund Sundararajan, Amir NajmiICML 2020 · 799 citations
- Estimating Training Data Influence by Tracing Gradient DescentGarima Pruthi, Frederick Liu, Satyen Kale, Mukund SundararajanNeurIPS 2020 · 784 citations
- What Neural Networks Memorize and Why: Discovering the Long Tail via Influence EstimationVitaly Feldman, Chiyuan ZhangNeurIPS 2020 · 674 citations
- Post-processing for Individual FairnessFelix Petersen, Debarghya Mukherjee, Yuekai Sun, Mikhail YurochkinNeurIPS 2021 · 115 citations
Related papers
- Fair Infinitesimal Jackknife: Mitigating the Influence of Biased Training Data Points Without RefittingPrasanna Sattigeri, Soumya Ghosh, Inkit Padhi, Pierre L. Dognin et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 36 citations
- Understanding Fairness and Prediction Error through Subspace Decomposition and Influence AnalysisEnze Shi, Pankaj Bhagwat, Zhixian Yang, Linglong Kong et al.NeurIPS 2025
- Empirical Likelihood for Fair ClassificationPangpang Liu, Yichuan ZhaoICLR 2024 · 1 citation
- Training individually fair ML models with sensitive subspace robustnessMikhail Yurochkin, Amanda Bower, Yuekai SunICLR 2020 · 123 citations
- Influence-Based Fair Selection for Sample-Discriminative Backdoor AttackQi Wei, Shuo He, Jiahan Zhang, Lei Feng et al.AAAI 2025 · 1 citation
