Empirical Likelihood for Fair Classification
Pangpang Liu, Yichuan Zhao
Abstract
Machine learning algorithms are commonly being deployed in decision-making systems that have a direct impact on human lives. However, if these algorithms are trained solely to minimize training/test errors, they may inadvertently discriminate against individuals based on their sensitive attributes, such as gender, race or age. Recently, algorithms that ensure the fairness are developed in the machine learning community. Fairness criteria are applied by these algorithms to measure the fairness, but they often use the point estimate to assess the fairness and fail to consider the uncertainty of the sample fairness criterion once the algorithms are deployed. We suggest that assessing the fairness should take the uncertainty into account. In this paper, we use the covariance as a proxy for the fairness and develop the confidence region of the covariance vector using empirical likelihood (Owen, 1988) . Our confidence region based fairness constraints for classification take uncertainty into consideration during fairness assessment. The proposed confidence region can be used to test the fairness and impose fairness constraint using the significance level as a tool to balance the accuracy and fairness. Simulation studies show that our method exactly covers the target Type I error rate and effectively balances the trade-off between accuracy and fairness. Finally, we conduct data analysis to demonstrate the effectiveness of our method.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 18576502-72f7-46c4-9b4c-35b47498e68fBuilds on7
- Retiring Adult: New Datasets for Fair Machine LearningFrances Ding, Moritz Hardt, John Miller, Ludwig SchmidtNeurIPS 2021 · 671 citations
- CoinDICE: Off-Policy Confidence Interval EstimationBo Dai, Ofir Nachum, Yinlam Chow, Lihong Li et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 96 citations
- Rényi Fair InferenceSina Baharlouei, Maher Nouiehed, Ahmad Beirami, Meisam RazaviyaynICLR 2020 · 69 citations
- Testing Group Fairness via Optimal Transport ProjectionsNian Si, Karthyek Murthy, Jose H. Blanchet, Viet Anh NguyenICML 2021 · 37 citations
- Statistical inference for individual fairnessSubha Maity, Songkai Xue, Mikhail Yurochkin, Yuekai SunICLR 2021 · 21 citations
Related papers
- Conformalized Fairness via Quantile RegressionMeichen Liu, Lei Ding, Dengdeng Yu, Wulong Liu et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22 citations
- Robust Fairness Under Covariate ShiftAshkan Rezaei, Anqi Liu, Omid Memarrast, Brian D. ZiebartAAAI 2021 · 94 citations
- Learning Fair Naive Bayes Classifiers by Discovering and Eliminating Discrimination PatternsYooJung Choi, Golnoosh Farnadi, Behrouz Babaki, Guy Van den BroeckAAAI 2020 · 31 citations
- SURE: Robust, Explainable, and Fair Classification without Sensitive AttributesDeepayan ChakrabartiKDD 2023 · 1 citation
- Constructing a Fair Classifier with Generated Fair DataTaeuk Jang, Feng Zheng, Xiaoqian WangAAAI 2021 · 44 citations
