SURE: Robust, Explainable, and Fair Classification without Sensitive Attributes
Deepayan Chakrabarti
Abstract
A classifier that is accurate on average may still underperform for "sensitive" subsets of people. Such subsets could be based on race, gender, age, etc. The goal of a fair classifier is to perform well for all sensitive subsets. But often, the sensitive subsets are not known a priori. So we may want the classifier to perform well on all subsets that are likely to be sensitive. We propose an iterative algorithm called SURE for this problem. In each iteration, SURE identifies high-risk zones in feature space where the risk of unfair classification is statistically significant. By changing the loss function's weights for points from these zones, SURE builds a fair classifier. The emphasis on statistical significance makes SURE robust to noise. The high-risk zones are intuitive and interpretable. Every step of our method is explainable in terms of significance tests. Finally, SURE is fast and parameter-free. Experiments on both simulated and real-world datasets show that SURE is competitive with the state-of-the-art.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 62b2cd05-b11d-4277-8d80-bfaddfdb9976Builds on10
- Ditto: Fair and Robust Federated Learning Through PersonalizationTian Li, Shengyuan Hu, Ahmad Beirami, Virginia SmithICML 2021 · 1,313 citations
- An Investigation of Why Overparameterization Exacerbates Spurious CorrelationsShiori Sagawa, Aditi Raghunathan, Pang Wei Koh, Percy LiangICML 2020 · 436 citations
- Fairness without Demographics through Adversarially Reweighted LearningPreethi Lahoti, Alex Beutel, Jilin Chen, Kang Lee et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 406 citations
- Robust Optimization for Fairness with Noisy Protected GroupsSerena Lutong Wang, Wenshuo Guo, Harikrishna Narasimhan, Andrew Cotter et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 134 citations
- Post-processing for Individual FairnessFelix Petersen, Debarghya Mukherjee, Yuekai Sun, Mikhail YurochkinNeurIPS 2021 · 115 citations
Related papers
- Beyond Adult and COMPAS: Fair Multi-Class Prediction via Information ProjectionWael Alghamdi, Hsiang Hsu, Haewon Jeong, Hao Wang et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 57 citations
- Empirical Likelihood for Fair ClassificationPangpang Liu, Yichuan ZhaoICLR 2024 · 1 citation
- Learning Fair Naive Bayes Classifiers by Discovering and Eliminating Discrimination PatternsYooJung Choi, Golnoosh Farnadi, Behrouz Babaki, Guy Van den BroeckAAAI 2020 · 31 citations
- Ensuring Fairness Beyond the Training DataDebmalya Mandal, Samuel Deng, Suman Jana, Jeannette M. Wing et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 68 citations
- Conformal Classification with Equalized Coverage for Adaptively Selected GroupsYanfei Zhou, Matteo SesiaNeurIPS 2024 · 14 citations
