Lune

ICLR2024Top-tier venue

FFB: A Fair Fairness Benchmark for In-Processing Group Fairness Methods

Xiaotian Han, Jianfeng Chi, Yu Chen, Qifan Wang, Han Zhao, Na Zou, Xia Hu

2024Year
48Citations
10Top-tier citations

Abstract

This paper introduces the Fair Fairness Benchmark (FFB), a benchmarking framework for in-processing group fairness methods. Ensuring fairness in machine learning is important for ethical compliance. However, there exist challenges in comparing and developing fairness methods due to inconsistencies in experimental settings, lack of accessible algorithmic implementations, and limited extensibility of current fairness packages and tools. To address these issues, we introduce an opensource standardized benchmark for evaluating in-processing group fairness methods and provide a comprehensive analysis of state-of-the-art methods to ensure different notions of group fairness. This work offers the following key contributions: the provision of flexible, extensible, minimalistic, and research-oriented open-source code; the establishment of unified fairness method benchmarking pipelines; and extensive benchmarking, which yields key insights from 45, 079 experiments, 14, 428 GPU hours. We believe that our work will significantly facilitate the growth and development of the fairness research community. The benchmark is available at https://github.com/ahxt/fair_fairness_benchmark .

Ask about this paper

Your agent reads all of it.

Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.

Questions to start from

Your agent calls

Luneget_paper_fulltext

Ask in Lune

Free to start. No credit card required.

lune papers fulltext 1a6bc3f8-179d-4199-9182-49766728bc40

Cited by top-tier papers10

Ask how each one uses it

Builds on10

Related papers

Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines