FFB: A Fair Fairness Benchmark for In-Processing Group Fairness Methods
Xiaotian Han, Jianfeng Chi, Yu Chen, Qifan Wang, Han Zhao, Na Zou, Xia Hu
Abstract
This paper introduces the Fair Fairness Benchmark (FFB), a benchmarking framework for in-processing group fairness methods. Ensuring fairness in machine learning is important for ethical compliance. However, there exist challenges in comparing and developing fairness methods due to inconsistencies in experimental settings, lack of accessible algorithmic implementations, and limited extensibility of current fairness packages and tools. To address these issues, we introduce an opensource standardized benchmark for evaluating in-processing group fairness methods and provide a comprehensive analysis of state-of-the-art methods to ensure different notions of group fairness. This work offers the following key contributions: the provision of flexible, extensible, minimalistic, and research-oriented open-source code; the establishment of unified fairness method benchmarking pipelines; and extensive benchmarking, which yields key insights from 45, 079 experiments, 14, 428 GPU hours. We believe that our work will significantly facilitate the growth and development of the fairness research community. The benchmark is available at https://github.com/ahxt/fair_fairness_benchmark .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 1a6bc3f8-179d-4199-9182-49766728bc40Cited by top-tier papers10
- OxonFair: A Flexible Toolkit for Algorithmic FairnessEoin Delaney, Zihao Fu, Sandra Wachter, Brent D. Mittelstadt et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 13 citations
- fairret: a Framework for Differentiable Fairness Regularization TermsMaarten Buyl, MaryBeth Defrance, Tijl De BieICLR 2024 · 8 citations
- On the Maximal Local Disparity of Fairness-Aware ClassifiersJinqiu Jin, Haoxuan Li, Fuli FengICML 2024 · 5 citations
- FedFACT: A Provable Framework for Controllable Group-Fairness Calibration in Federated LearningLi Zhang, Zhongxuan Han, Xiaohua Feng, Jiaming Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations
- LoGoFair: Post-Processing for Local and Global Fairness in Federated LearningLi Zhang, Chaochao Chen, Zhongxuan Han, Qiyong Zhong et al.AAAI 2025 · 1 citation
Builds on10
- Retiring Adult: New Datasets for Fair Machine LearningFrances Ding, Moritz Hardt, John Miller, Ludwig SchmidtNeurIPS 2021 · 671 citations
- Rényi Fair InferenceSina Baharlouei, Maher Nouiehed, Ahmad Beirami, Meisam RazaviyaynICLR 2020 · 69 citations
- On Learning Fairness and Accuracy on Multiple SubgroupsChangjian Shui, Gezheng Xu, Qi Chen, Jiaqi Li et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 58 citations
- Achieving Fairness at No Utility Cost via Data Reweighing with InfluencePeizhao Li, Hongfu LiuICML 2022 · 57 citations
- Fairness without Demographics through Knowledge DistillationJunyi Chai, Taeuk Jang, Xiaoqian WangNeurIPS 2022 · 57 citations
Related papers
- FRAPPÉ: A Group Fairness Framework for Post-Processing EverythingAlexandru Tifrea, Preethi Lahoti, Ben Packer, Yoni Halpern et al.ICML 2024 · 15 citations
- Fair Without Leveling Down: A New Intersectional Fairness DefinitionGaurav Maheshwari, Aurélien Bellet, Pascal Denis, Mikaela KellerEMNLP 2023 · 3 citations
- MEDFAIR: Benchmarking Fairness for Medical ImagingYongshuo Zong, Yongxin Yang, Timothy M. HospedalesICLR 2023 · 15 citations
- A Large-Scale Empirical Study on Improving the Fairness of Image Classification ModelsJunjie Yang, Jiajun Jiang, Zeyu Sun, Junjie ChenISSTA 2024 · 4 citations
- Towards Understanding Fairness and its Composition in Ensemble Machine LearningUsman Gohar, Sumon Biswas, Hridesh RajanICSE 2023 · 30 citations
