Fair Without Leveling Down: A New Intersectional Fairness Definition
Gaurav Maheshwari, Aurélien Bellet, Pascal Denis, Mikaela Keller
Abstract
In this work, we consider the problem of intersectional group fairness in the classification setting, where the objective is to learn discrimination-free models in the presence of several intersecting sensitive groups. First, we illustrate various shortcomings of existing fairness measures commonly used to capture intersectional fairness. Then, we propose a new definition called the 𝛼-Intersectional Fairness, which combines the absolute and the relative performance across sensitive groups and can be seen as a generalization of the notion of differential fairness. We highlight several desirable properties of the proposed definition and analyze its relation to other fairness measures. Finally, we benchmark multiple popular in-processing fair machine learning approaches using our new fairness definition and show that they do not achieve any improvement over a simple baseline. Our results reveal that the increase in fairness measured by previous definitions hides a “leveling down” effect, i.e., degrading the best performance over groups rather than improving the worst one.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 595bf2f2-99d7-42a6-95d1-da72908cbb1dCited by top-tier papers4
- Hate Speech Detection with Generalizable Target-aware FairnessTong Chen, Danny Wang, Xurong Liang, Marten Risius et al.KDD 2024 · 7 citations
- Metrics for What, Metrics for Whom: Assessing Actionability of Bias Evaluation Metrics in NLPPieter Delobelle, Giuseppe Attanasio, Debora Nozza, Su Lin Blodgett et al.EMNLP 2024 · 4 citations
- Doubly-Regressing Approach for Subgroup FairnessKunwoong Kim, Kyungseon Lee, Jihu Lee, Dongyoon Yang et al.ICLR 2026 · 1 citation
- Software Fairness Dilemma: Is Bias Mitigation a Zero-Sum Game?Zhenpeng Chen, Xinyue Li, Jie M. Zhang, Weisong Sun et al.FSE 2025
Builds on6
- Bias Out-of-the-Box: An Empirical Analysis of Intersectional Occupational Biases in Popular Generative Language ModelsHannah Rose Kirk, Yennie Jun, Filippo Volpin, Haider Iqbal et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 243 citations
- Too Relaxed to Be FairMichael Lohaus, Michaël Perrot, Ulrike von LuxburgICML 2020 · 80 citations
- Fairness with Overlapping Groups; a Probabilistic PerspectiveForest Yang, Mouhamadou Cisse, Oluwasanmi KoyejoNeurIPS 2020 · 71 citations
- Leveling Down in Computer Vision: Pareto Inefficiencies in Fair Deep ClassifiersDominik Zietlow, Michael Lohaus, Guha Balakrishnan, Matthäus Kleindessner et al.CVPR 2022 · 33 citations
- Null It Out: Guarding Protected Attributes by Iterative Nullspace ProjectionShauli Ravfogel, Yanai Elazar, Hila Gonen, Michael Twiton et al.ACL 2020 · 25 citations
Related papers
- Bounding and Approximating Intersectional Fairness through Marginal FairnessMathieu Molina, Patrick LoiseauNeurIPS 2022 · 16 citations
- A Large-Scale Empirical Study on Improving the Fairness of Image Classification ModelsJunjie Yang, Jiajun Jiang, Zeyu Sun, Junjie ChenISSTA 2024 · 4 citations
- FRAPPÉ: A Group Fairness Framework for Post-Processing EverythingAlexandru Tifrea, Preethi Lahoti, Ben Packer, Yoni Halpern et al.ICML 2024 · 15 citations
- Bayes-Optimal Fair Classification with Multiple Sensitive FeaturesYi Yang, Yinghui Huang, Xiangyu ChangAAAI 2026 · 2 citations
- Measuring Fairness of Text Classifiers via Prediction SensitivitySatyapriya Krishna, Rahul Gupta, Apurv Verma, Jwala Dhamala et al.ACL 2022 · 10 citations
