Bounding and Approximating Intersectional Fairness through Marginal Fairness
Mathieu Molina, Patrick Loiseau
Abstract
Discrimination in machine learning often arises along multiple dimensions (a.k.a. protected attributes); it is then desirable to ensure intersectional fairness -- i.e., that no subgroup is discriminated against. It is known that ensuring marginal fairness for every dimension independently is not sufficient in general. Due to the exponential number of subgroups, however, directly measuring intersectional fairness from data is impossible. In this paper, our primary goal is to understand in detail the relationship between marginal and intersectional fairness through statistical analysis. We first identify a set of sufficient conditions under which an exact relationship can be obtained. Then, we prove bounds (easily computable through marginal fairness and other meaningful statistical quantities) in high-probability on intersectional fairness in the general case. Beyond their descriptive value, we show that these theoretical bounds can be leveraged to derive a heuristic improving the approximation and bounds of intersectional fairness by choosing, in a relevant manner, protected attributes for which we describe intersectional subgroups. Finally, we test the performance of our approximations and bounds on real and synthetic data-sets.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 7c05adbf-a7a8-43af-aee8-29c1b8dfd4a6Cited by top-tier papers5
- Trading-off price for data quality to achieve fair online allocationMathieu Molina, Nicolas Gast, Patrick Loiseau, Vianney PerchetNeurIPS 2023 · 7 citations
- A Closed-Form Solution for Debiasing Vision-Language Models with Utility Guarantees Across Modalities and TasksTangzheng Lian, Guanyu Hu, Yijing Ren, Dimitrios Kollias et al.CVPR 2026 · 3 citations
- Size-adaptive Hypothesis Testing for FairnessAntonio Ferrara, Francesco Cozzi, Alan Perotti, André Panisson et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations
- The Price of Opportunity Fairness in Matroid Allocation ProblemsRémi Castera, Felipe Garrido-Lucero, Patrick Loiseau, Simon Mauras et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations
- Doubly-Regressing Approach for Subgroup FairnessKunwoong Kim, Kyungseon Lee, Jihu Lee, Dongyoon Yang et al.ICLR 2026 · 1 citation
Builds on5
- Minimax Pareto Fairness: A Multi Objective PerspectiveNatalia Martínez, Martín Bertrán, Guillermo SapiroICML 2020 · 232 citations
- Fairness with Overlapping Groups; a Probabilistic PerspectiveForest Yang, Mouhamadou Cisse, Oluwasanmi KoyejoNeurIPS 2020 · 71 citations
- Achieving Equalized Odds by Resampling Sensitive AttributesYaniv Romano, Stephen Bates, Emmanuel J. CandèsNeurIPS 2020 · 65 citations
- Can I Trust My Fairness Metric? Assessing Fairness with Unlabeled Data and Bayesian InferenceDisi Ji, Padhraic Smyth, Mark SteyversNeurIPS 2020 · 57 citations
- Assessing Fairness in the Presence of Missing DataYiliang Zhang, Qi LongNeurIPS 2021 · 51 citations
Related papers
- Fair Without Leveling Down: A New Intersectional Fairness DefinitionGaurav Maheshwari, Aurélien Bellet, Pascal Denis, Mikaela KellerEMNLP 2023 · 3 citations
- Diversity Drives Fairness: Ensemble of Higher Order Mutants for Intersectional Fairness of Machine Learning SoftwareZhenpeng Chen, Xinyue Li, Jie M. Zhang, Federica Sarro et al.ICSE 2025 · 2 citations
- Fairness Improvement with Multiple Protected Attributes: How Far Are We?Zhenpeng Chen, Jie M. Zhang, Federica Sarro, Mark HarmanICSE 2024 · 33 citations
- Intersectional Unfairness DiscoveryGezheng Xu, Qi Chen, Charles Ling, Boyu Wang et al.ICML 2024 · 6 citations
- Mitigating Subgroup Unfairness in Machine Learning Classifiers: A Data-Driven ApproachYin Lin, Samika Gupta, H. V. JagadishICDE 2024 · 5 citations
