Diversity Drives Fairness: Ensemble of Higher Order Mutants for Intersectional Fairness of Machine Learning Software
Zhenpeng Chen, Xinyue Li, Jie M. Zhang, Federica Sarro, Yang Liu
Abstract
Intersectional fairness is a critical requirement for Machine Learning (ML) software, demanding fairness across subgroups defined by multiple protected attributes. This paper introduces FairHOME, a novel ensemble approach using higher order mutation of inputs to enhance intersectional fairness of ML software during the inference phase. Inspired by social science theories highlighting the benefits of diversity, FairHOME generates mutants representing diverse subgroups for each input instance, thus broadening the array of perspectives to foster a fairer decision-making process. Unlike conventional ensemble methods that combine predictions made by different models, FairHOME combines predictions for the original input and its mutants, all generated by the same ML model, to reach a final decision. Notably, FairHOME is even applicable to deployed ML software as it bypasses the need for training new models. We extensively evaluate FairHOME against seven state-of-the-art fairness improvement methods across 24 decision-making tasks using widely adopted metrics. FairHOME consistently outperforms existing methods across all metrics considered. On average, it enhances intersectional fairness by 47.5 %, surpassing the currently best-performing method by 9.6 percentage points.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext e07b9883-a79c-4645-9523-cf1fd62e0881Cited by top-tier papers3
- Fairness Testing of Large Language Models in Role-PlayingXinyue Li, Zhenpeng Chen, Jie M. Zhang, Ying Xiao et al.FSE 2026 · 5 citations
- Dissecting Global Search: A Simple Yet Effective Method to Boost Individual Discrimination Testing and RepairLili Quan, Tianlin Li, Xiaofei Xie, Zhenpeng Chen et al.ICSE 2025 · 2 citations
- Fairness Is Not Just Ethical: Performance Trade-Off via Data Correlation Tuning to Mitigate Bias in ML SoftwareYing Xiao, Shangwen Wang, Sicen Liu, Dingyuan Xue et al.ICSE 2026
Builds on22
- Bias in machine learning software: why? how? what to do?Joymallya Chakraborty, Suvodeep Majumder, Tim MenziesFSE 2021 · 186 citations
- Fairway: a way to build fair ML softwareJoymallya Chakraborty, Suvodeep Majumder, Zhe Yu, Tim MenziesFSE 2020 · 131 citations
- White-box fairness testing through adversarial samplingPeixin Zhang, Jingyi Wang, Jun Sun, Guoliang Dong et al.ICSE 2020 · 127 citations
- Collaboration Challenges in Building ML-Enabled Systems: Communication, Documentation, Engineering, and ProcessNadia Nahar, Shurui Zhou, Grace A. Lewis, Christian KästnerICSE 2022 · 122 citations
- Fair preprocessing: towards understanding compositional fairness of data transformers in machine learning pipelineSumon Biswas, Hridesh RajanFSE 2021 · 101 citations
Related papers
- Individual Arbitrariness and Group FairnessCarol Xuan Long, Hsiang Hsu, Wael Alghamdi, Flávio P. CalmonNeurIPS 2023 · 16 citations
- Fairness Improvement with Multiple Protected Attributes: How Far Are We?Zhenpeng Chen, Jie M. Zhang, Federica Sarro, Mark HarmanICSE 2024 · 33 citations
- MirrorFair: Fixing Fairness Bugs in Machine Learning Software via Counterfactual PredictionsYing Xiao, Jie M. Zhang, Yepang Liu, Mohammad Reza Mousavi et al.FSE 2024
- MAAT: a novel ensemble approach to addressing fairness and performance bugs for machine learning softwareZhenpeng Chen, Jie M. Zhang, Federica Sarro, Mark HarmanFSE 2022 · 65 citations
- Towards Understanding Fairness and its Composition in Ensemble Machine LearningUsman Gohar, Sumon Biswas, Hridesh RajanICSE 2023 · 30 citations
