Dissecting Global Search: A Simple Yet Effective Method to Boost Individual Discrimination Testing and Repair
Lili Quan, Tianlin Li, Xiaofei Xie, Zhenpeng Chen, Sen Chen, Lingxiao Jiang, Xiaohong Li
Abstract
Deep Learning (DL) has achieved significant success in socially critical decision-making applications but often exhibits unfair behaviors, raising social concerns. Among these unfair behaviors, individual discrimination-examining inequalities between instance pairs with identical profiles differing only in sensitive attributes such as gender, race, and age-is extremely socially impactful. Existing methods have made significant and commendable efforts in testing individual discrimination before deployment. However, their efficiency and effectiveness remain limited, particularly when evaluating relatively fairer models. It remains unclear which phase of the existing testing framework (global or local) is the primary bottleneck limiting performance.
Facing the above issues, we first identify that enhancing the global phase consistently improves overall testing effectiveness compared to enhancing the local phase. This motivates us to propose Genetic-Random Fairness Testing (GRFT), an effective and efficient method. In the global phase, we use a genetic algorithm to guide the search for more global discriminatory instances. In the local phase, we apply a light random search to explore the neighbors of these instances, avoiding time-consuming computations. Additionally, based on the fitness score, we also propose a straightforward yet effective repair approach. For a thorough evaluation, we conduct extensive experiments involving 6 testing methods, 5 datasets, 261 models (including 5 naively trained, 64 repaired, and 192 quantized for on-device deployment), and sixteen combinations of sensitive attributes, showing the superior performance of GRFT and our repair method.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 22067dee-eb42-4545-b95b-469b80e3f419Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on23
- Fairness without Demographics through Adversarially Reweighted LearningPreethi Lahoti, Alex Beutel, Jilin Chen, Kang Lee et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 406 citations
- Bias in machine learning software: why? how? what to do?Joymallya Chakraborty, Suvodeep Majumder, Tim MenziesFSE 2021 · 186 citations
- Fairway: a way to build fair ML softwareJoymallya Chakraborty, Suvodeep Majumder, Zhe Yu, Tim MenziesFSE 2020 · 131 citations
- White-box fairness testing through adversarial samplingPeixin Zhang, Jingyi Wang, Jun Sun, Guoliang Dong et al.ICSE 2020 · 127 citations
- Fair preprocessing: towards understanding compositional fairness of data transformers in machine learning pipelineSumon Biswas, Hridesh RajanFSE 2021 · 101 citations
Related papers
- MAFT: Efficient Model-Agnostic Fairness Testing for Deep Neural Networks via Zero-Order Gradient SearchZhaohui Wang, Min Zhang, Jingran Yang, Bojie Shao et al.ICSE 2024 · 6 citations
- Efficient white-box fairness testing through gradient searchLingfeng Zhang, Yueling Zhang, Min ZhangISSTA 2021 · 51 citations
- Approximation-guided Fairness Testing through Discriminatory Space AnalysisZhenjiang Zhao, Takahisa Toda, Takashi KitamuraASE 2024
- NeuronFair: Interpretable White-Box Fairness Testing through Biased Neuron IdentificationHaibin Zheng, Zhiqing Chen, Tianyu Du, Xuhong Zhang et al.ICSE 2022 · 58 citations
- RULER: discriminative and iterative adversarial training for deep neural network fairnessGuanhong Tao, Weisong Sun, Tingxu Han, Chunrong Fang et al.FSE 2022 · 29 citations
