Strategic Littlestone Dimension: Improved Bounds on Online Strategic Classification
Saba Ahmadi, Kunhe Yang, Hanrui Zhang
Abstract
We study the problem of online binary classification in settings where strategic agents can modify their observable features to receive a positive classification. We model the set of feasible manipulations by a directed graph over the feature space, and assume the learner only observes the manipulated features instead of the original ones. We introduce the Strategic Littlestone Dimension, a new combinatorial measure that captures the joint complexity of the hypothesis class and the manipulation graph. We demonstrate that it characterizes the instance-optimal mistake bounds for deterministic learning algorithms in the realizable setting. We also achieve improved regret in the agnostic setting by a refined agnostic-to-realizable reduction that accounts for the additional challenge of not observing agents' original features. Finally, we relax the assumption that the learner knows the manipulation graph, instead assuming their knowledge is captured by a family of graphs. We derive regret bounds in both the realizable setting where all agents manipulate according to the same graph within the graph family, and the agnostic setting where the manipulation graphs are chosen adversarially and not consistently modeled by a single graph in the family.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers4
- Learning in Structured Stackelberg GamesNina Balcan, Kiriaki Fragkia, Keegan HarrisICML 2026 · 4 citations
- Conservative classifiers do consistently well with improving agents: characterizing statistical and online learningDravyansh Sharma, Alec SunNeurIPS 2025 · 3 citations
- Online Strategic Classification With Noise and Partial FeedbackTianrun Zhao, Xiaojie Mao, Yong LiangNeurIPS 2025 · 1 citation
- Should Decision-Makers Reveal Classifiers in Online Strategic Classification?Han Shao, Shuo Xie, Kunhe YangICML 2025
Builds on10
- Performative PredictionJuan C. Perdomo, Tijana Zrnic, Celestine Mendler-Dünner, Moritz HardtICML 2020 · 422 citations
- Learning Strategy-Aware Linear ClassifiersYiling Chen, Yang Liu, Chara PodimataNeurIPS 2020 · 110 citations
- Strategic Classification in the DarkGanesh Ghalme, Vineet Nair, Itay Eilat, Inbal Talgam-Cohen et al.ICML 2021 · 70 citations
- Incentive-Aware PAC LearningHanrui Zhang, Vincent ConitzerAAAI 2021 · 54 citations
- PAC-Learning for Strategic ClassificationRavi Sundaram, Anil Vullikanti, Haifeng Xu, Fan YaoICML 2021 · 52 citations
Related papers
- A Trichotomy for Transductive Online LearningSteve Hanneke, Shay Moran, Jonathan ShaferNeurIPS 2023 · 15 citations
- Strategic Classification under Unknown Personalized ManipulationHan Shao, Avrim Blum, Omar MontasserNeurIPS 2023 · 23 citations
- Multiclass Transductive Online LearningSteve Hanneke, Vinod Raman, Amirreza Shaeiri, Unique SubediNeurIPS 2024 · 9 citations
- Littlestone Classes are Privately Online LearnableNoah Golowich, Roi LivniNeurIPS 2021 · 15 citations
- Learning Losses for Strategic ClassificationTosca Lechner, Ruth UrnerAAAI 2022 · 26 citations
