Incentive-Aware PAC Learning
Hanrui Zhang, Vincent Conitzer
Abstract
We study PAC learning in the presence of strategic manipulation, where data points may modify their features in certain predefined ways in order to receive a better outcome. We show that the vanilla ERM principle fails to achieve any nontrivial guarantee in this context. Instead, we propose an incentive-aware version of the ERM principle which has asymptotically optimal sample complexity. We then focus our attention on incentive-compatible classifiers, which provably prevent any kind of strategic manipulation. We give a sample complexity bound that is, curiously, independent of the hypothesis class, for the ERM principle restricted to incentive-compatible classifiers. This suggests that incentive compatibility alone can act as an effective means of regularization. We further show that it is without loss of generality to consider only incentive-compatible classifiers when opportunities for strategic manipulation satisfy a transitivity condition. As a consequence, in such cases, our hypothesis-class-independent sample complexity bound applies even without incentive compatibility. Our results set the foundations of incentive-aware PAC learning.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers29
- Who Leads and Who Follows in Strategic Classification?Tijana Zrnic, Eric Mazumdar, S. Shankar Sastry, Michael I. JordanNeurIPS 2021 · 76 citations
- Strategic Classification in the DarkGanesh Ghalme, Vineet Nair, Itay Eilat, Inbal Talgam-Cohen et al.ICML 2021 · 70 citations
- Strategic Classification Made PracticalSagi Levanon, Nir RosenfeldICML 2021 · 68 citations
- Alternative Microfoundations for Strategic ClassificationMeena Jagadeesan, Celestine Mendler-Dünner, Moritz HardtICML 2021 · 55 citations
- PAC-Learning for Strategic ClassificationRavi Sundaram, Anil Vullikanti, Haifeng Xu, Fan YaoICML 2021 · 52 citations
Builds on3
- The Intrinsic Robustness of Stochastic Bandits to Strategic ManipulationZhe Feng, David C. Parkes, Haifeng XuICML 2020 · 31 citations
- Classification with Strategically Withheld DataAnilesh K. Krishnaswamy, Haoming Li, David Rein, Hanrui Zhang et al.AAAI 2021 · 17 citations
- Automated Mechanism Design for Classification with Partial VerificationHanrui Zhang, Yu Cheng, Vincent ConitzerAAAI 2021 · 13 citations
Related papers
- A Game-Theoretic Analysis of the Empirical Revenue Maximization Algorithm with Endogenous SamplingXiaotie Deng, Ron Lavi, Tao Lin, Qi Qi et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 4 citations
- Incentivized Truthful Communication for Federated BanditsZhepei Wei, Chuanhao Li, Tianze Ren, Haifeng Xu et al.ICLR 2024 · 2 citations
- Strategic Classification under Unknown Personalized ManipulationHan Shao, Avrim Blum, Omar MontasserNeurIPS 2023 · 23 citations
- Bounded Incentives in Manipulating the Probabilistic Serial RuleZihe Wang, Zhide Wei, Jie ZhangAAAI 2020 · 15 citations
- Strategic Classification With ExternalitiesSafwan Hossain, Evi Micha, Yiling Chen, Ariel D. ProcacciaICLR 2025
