Strategic Classification under Unknown Personalized Manipulation
Han Shao, Avrim Blum, Omar Montasser
Abstract
We study the fundamental mistake bound and sample complexity in the strategic classification, where agents can strategically manipulate their feature vector up to an extent in order to be predicted as positive. For example, given a classifier determining college admission, student candidates may try to take easier classes to improve their GPA, retake SAT and change schools in an effort to fool the classifier. Ball manipulations are a widely studied class of manipulations in the literature, where agents can modify their feature vector within a bounded radius ball. Unlike most prior work, our work considers manipulations to be personalized, meaning that agents can have different levels of manipulation abilities (e.g., varying radii for ball manipulations), and unknown to the learner. We formalize the learning problem in an interaction model where the learner first deploys a classifier and the agent manipulates the feature vector within their manipulation set to game the deployed classifier. We investigate various scenarios in terms of the information available to the learner during the interaction, such as observing the original feature vector before or after deployment, observing the manipulated feature vector, or not seeing either the original or the manipulated feature vector. We begin by providing online mistake bounds and PAC sample complexity in these scenarios for ball manipulations. We also explore non-ball manipulations and show that, even in the simplest scenario where both the original and the manipulated feature vectors are revealed, the mistake bounds and sample complexity are lower bounded by when the target function belongs to a known class .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers11
- Strategic Littlestone Dimension: Improved Bounds on Online Strategic ClassificationSaba Ahmadi, Kunhe Yang, Hanrui ZhangNeurIPS 2024 · 9 citations
- Classification Under Strategic Self-SelectionGuy Horowitz, Yonatan Sommer, Moran Koren, Nir RosenfeldICML 2024 · 8 citations
- Who's Gaming the System? A Causally-Motivated Approach for Detecting Strategic AdaptationTrenton Chang, Lindsay A. Warrenburg, Sae-Hwan Park, Ravi B. Parikh et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 7 citations
- Breaking the Gradient Barrier: Unveiling Large Language Models for Strategic ClassificationXinpeng Lv, Yunxin Mao, Haoxuan Li, Ke Liang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 5 citations
- Strategic Classification with Non-Linear ClassifiersBenyamin Trachtenberg, Nir RosenfeldNeurIPS 2025 · 5 citations
Builds on7
- Learning Strategy-Aware Linear ClassifiersYiling Chen, Yang Liu, Chara PodimataNeurIPS 2020 · 110 citations
- Who Leads and Who Follows in Strategic Classification?Tijana Zrnic, Eric Mazumdar, S. Shankar Sastry, Michael I. JordanNeurIPS 2021 · 76 citations
- Alternative Microfoundations for Strategic ClassificationMeena Jagadeesan, Celestine Mendler-Dünner, Moritz HardtICML 2021 · 55 citations
- Incentive-Aware PAC LearningHanrui Zhang, Vincent ConitzerAAAI 2021 · 54 citations
- PAC-Learning for Strategic ClassificationRavi Sundaram, Anil Vullikanti, Haifeng Xu, Fan YaoICML 2021 · 52 citations
Related papers
- Strategic Classification with Unknown User ManipulationsTosca Lechner, Ruth Urner, Shai Ben-DavidICML 2023 · 21 citations
- Online Strategic Classification With Noise and Partial FeedbackTianrun Zhao, Xiaojie Mao, Yong LiangNeurIPS 2025 · 1 citation
- Learning Losses for Strategic ClassificationTosca Lechner, Ruth UrnerAAAI 2022 · 26 citations
- Should Decision-Makers Reveal Classifiers in Online Strategic Classification?Han Shao, Shuo Xie, Kunhe YangICML 2025
- Bayesian Strategic ClassificationLee Cohen, Saeed Sharifi-Malvajerdi, Kevin Stangl, Ali Vakilian et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 18 citations
