Learning Losses for Strategic Classification
Tosca Lechner, Ruth Urner
Abstract
Strategic classification, i.e. classification under possible strategic manipulations of features, has received a lot of attention from both the machine learning and the game theory community. Most works focus on analysing properties of the optimal decision rule under such manipulations. In our work we take a learning theoretic perspective, focusing on the sample complexity needed to learn a good decision rule which is robust to strategic manipulation. We perform this analysis by introducing a novel loss function, the strategic manipulation loss, which takes into account both the accuracy of the final decision rule and its vulnerability to manipulation. We analyse the sample complexity for a known graph of possible manipulations in terms of the complexity of the function class and the manipulation graph. Additionally, we initialize the study of learning under unknown manipulation capabilities of the involved agents. Using techniques from transfer learning theory, we define a similarity measure for manipulation graphs and show that learning outcomes are robust with respect to small changes in the manipulation graph. Lastly, we analyse the (sample complexity of) learning of the manipulation capability of agents with respect to this similarity measure, providing novel guarantees for strategic classification with respect to an unknown manipulation graph.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers15
- Generalized Strategic Classification and the Case of Aligned IncentivesSagi Levanon, Nir RosenfeldICML 2022 · 30 citations
- Causal Strategic Classification: A Tale of Two ShiftsGuy Horowitz, Nir RosenfeldICML 2023 · 23 citations
- Strategic Classification under Unknown Personalized ManipulationHan Shao, Avrim Blum, Omar MontasserNeurIPS 2023 · 23 citations
- Strategic Classification with Unknown User ManipulationsTosca Lechner, Ruth Urner, Shai Ben-DavidICML 2023 · 21 citations
- Automating Data Annotation under Strategic Human Agents: Risks and Potential SolutionsTian Xie, Xueru ZhangNeurIPS 2024 · 12 citations
Builds on6
- Performative PredictionJuan C. Perdomo, Tijana Zrnic, Celestine Mendler-Dünner, Moritz HardtICML 2020 · 422 citations
- Strategic Classification is Causal Modeling in DisguiseJohn Miller, Smitha Milli, Moritz HardtICML 2020 · 127 citations
- Decisions, Counterfactual Explanations and Strategic BehaviorStratis Tsirtsis, Manuel Gomez RodriguezNeurIPS 2020 · 75 citations
- Alternative Microfoundations for Strategic ClassificationMeena Jagadeesan, Celestine Mendler-Dünner, Moritz HardtICML 2021 · 55 citations
- Incentive-Aware PAC LearningHanrui Zhang, Vincent ConitzerAAAI 2021 · 54 citations
Related papers
- Strategic Littlestone Dimension: Improved Bounds on Online Strategic ClassificationSaba Ahmadi, Kunhe Yang, Hanrui ZhangNeurIPS 2024 · 9 citations
- Strategic Classification with Non-Linear ClassifiersBenyamin Trachtenberg, Nir RosenfeldNeurIPS 2025 · 5 citations
- PAC-Learning for Strategic ClassificationRavi Sundaram, Anil Vullikanti, Haifeng Xu, Fan YaoICML 2021 · 52 citations
- One-Shot Strategic Classification Under Unknown CostsElan Rosenfeld, Nir RosenfeldICML 2024 · 10 citations
- Strategic Classification With ExternalitiesSafwan Hossain, Evi Micha, Yiling Chen, Ariel D. ProcacciaICLR 2025
