Beyond Bot Detection: Combating Fraudulent Online Survey Takers✱
Ziyi Zhang, Shuofei Zhu, Jaron Mink, Aiping Xiong, Linhai Song, Gang Wang
摘要
Different techniques have been recommended to detect fraudulent responses in online surveys, but little research has been taken to systematically test the extent to which they actually work in practice. In this paper, we conduct an empirical evaluation of 22 antifraud tests in two complementary online surveys. The first survey recruits Rust programmers on public online forums and social media networks. We find that fraudulent respondents involve both bot and human characteristics. Among different anti-fraud tests, those designed based on domain knowledge are the most effective. By combining individual tests, we can achieve a detection performance as good as commercial techniques while making the results more explainable. To explore these tests under a broader context, we ran a different survey on Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk). The results show that for a generic survey without requiring users to have any domain knowledge, it is more difficult to distinguish fraudulent responses. However, a subset of tests still remain effective. CCS CONCEPTS • Security and privacy → Intrusion/anomaly detection and malware mitigation.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了最后一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper3
- Understanding fraudulence in online qualitative studies: From the researcher's perspectiveAswati Panicker, Novia Nurain, Zaidat Ibrahim, Chun-Han Ariel Wang 等CHI 2024 · 被引用 26 次
- Understand Users' Privacy Perception and Decision of V2X Communication in Connected Autonomous VehiclesZekun Cai, Aiping XiongUSENIX Security 2023
- Beyond the Prank: The Hidden Expertise of TSS ScambaitersSaleh Alsyefi, Anish Chand, Matthew Edwards, Phani VadrevuCCS 2026
它引用的顶会 Paper6
- You Get Where You're Looking for: The Impact of Information Sources on Code SecurityYasemin Acar, Michael Backes, Sascha Fahl, Doowon Kim 等S&P 2016 · 被引用 325 次
- Good Bot, Bad Bot: Characterizing Automated Browsing ActivityXigao Li, Babak Amin Azad, Amir Rahmati, Nick NikiforakisS&P 2021 · 被引用 45 次
- One size does not fit all: a grounded theory and online survey study of developer preferences for security warning typesAnastasia Danilova, Alena Naiakshina, Matthew SmithICSE 2020 · 被引用 24 次
- Do you really code? Designing and Evaluating Screening Questions for Online Surveys with ProgrammersAnastasia Danilova, Alena Naiakshina, Stefan Horstmann, Matthew SmithICSE 2021 · 被引用 5 次
- CrawlPhish: Large-scale Analysis of Client-side Cloaking Techniques in PhishingPenghui Zhang, Adam Oest, Haehyun Cho, Zhibo Sun 等S&P 2021 · 被引用 1 次
相关 Paper
- Weak Programmers Need Not Apply, LLMs Welcome! Survey Screening in the AI EraIta Ryan, Utz Roedig, Klaas-Jan StolICSE 2026
- Learning and Programming Challenges of Rust: A Mixed-Methods StudyShuofei Zhu, Ziyi Zhang, Boqin Qin, Aiping Xiong 等ICSE 2022 · 被引用 27 次
- How Well Do My Results Generalize? Comparing Security and Privacy Survey Results from MTurk, Web, and Telephone SamplesElissa M. Redmiles, Sean Kross, Michelle L. MazurekS&P 2019 · 被引用 222 次
- Where to Recruit for Security Development Studies: Comparing Six Software Developer SamplesHarjot Kaur, Sabrina Amft, Daniel Votipka, Yasemin Acar 等USENIX Security 2022
- Recruiting Participants With Programming Skills: A Comparison of Four Crowdsourcing Platforms and a CS Student Mailing ListMohammad Tahaei, Kami VanieaCHI 2022 · 被引用 45 次
