Testing Time Limits in Screener Questions for Online Surveys with Programmers
Anastasia Danilova, Stefan Horstmann, Matthew Smith, Alena Naiakshina
摘要
Recruiting study participants with programming skill is essential for researchers. As programming is not a common skill, recruiting programmers as participants in large numbers is challenging. Platforms like Amazon MTurk or Qualtrics offer to recruit participants with programming knowledge. As this is self-reported, participants without programming experience could still take part, either due to a misunderstanding or to obtain the study compensation. If these participants are not detected, the data quality will suffer. To tackle this, Danilova et al. [11] developed and tested screening tasks to detect non-programmers. Unfortunately, the most reliable screeners were also those that took the most time. Since screeners should take as little time as possible, we examine whether the introduction of time limits allows us to create more efficient (i.e., quicker but still reliable) screeners. Our results show that this is possible and we extend the pool of screeners and make recommendations on how to improve the process.
• Human-centered computing → Empirical studies in HCI.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了最后一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper6
- How WEIRD is Usable Privacy and Security Research?Ayako Akiyama Hasegawa, Daisuke Inoue, Mitsuaki AkiyamaUSENIX Security 2024 · 被引用 26 次
- Using AI Assistants in Software Development: A Qualitative Study on Security Practices and ConcernsJan H. Klemmer, Stefan Albert Horstmann, Nikhil Patnaik, Cordelia Ludden 等CCS 2024 · 被引用 14 次
- Engaging Company Developers in Security Research Studies: A Comprehensive Literature Review and Quantitative SurveyRaphael Serafini, Stefan Albert Horstmann, Alena NaiakshinaUSENIX Security 2024 · 被引用 7 次
- ChatGPT-Resistant Screening Instrument for Identifying Non-ProgrammersRaphael Serafini, Clemens Otto, Stefan Albert Horstmann, Alena NaiakshinaICSE 2024 · 被引用 4 次
- "Sorry for Bugging you so much." Exploring Developers' Behavior Towards Privacy-Compliant ImplementationStefan Albert Horstmann, Sandy Hong, David Klein, Raphael Serafini 等S&P 2025
它引用的顶会 Paper6
- You Get Where You're Looking for: The Impact of Information Sources on Code SecurityYasemin Acar, Michael Backes, Sascha Fahl, Doowon Kim 等S&P 2016 · 被引用 325 次
- Comparing the Usability of Cryptographic APIsYasemin Acar, Michael Backes, Sascha Fahl, Simson L. Garfinkel 等S&P 2017 · 被引用 261 次
- Why Do Developers Get Password Storage Wrong?: A Qualitative Usability StudyAlena Naiakshina, Anastasia Danilova, Christian Tiefenau, Marco Herzog 等CCS 2017 · 被引用 146 次
- On Conducting Security Developer Studies with CS Students: Examining a Password-Storage Study with CS Students, Freelancers, and Company DevelopersAlena Naiakshina, Anastasia Danilova, Eva Gerlitz, Matthew SmithCHI 2020 · 被引用 48 次
- One size does not fit all: a grounded theory and online survey study of developer preferences for security warning typesAnastasia Danilova, Alena Naiakshina, Matthew SmithICSE 2020 · 被引用 24 次
相关 Paper
- Do you really code? Designing and Evaluating Screening Questions for Online Surveys with ProgrammersAnastasia Danilova, Alena Naiakshina, Stefan Horstmann, Matthew SmithICSE 2021 · 被引用 5 次
- Recruiting Participants With Programming Skills: A Comparison of Four Crowdsourcing Platforms and a CS Student Mailing ListMohammad Tahaei, Kami VanieaCHI 2022 · 被引用 45 次
- Where to Recruit for Security Development Studies: Comparing Six Software Developer SamplesHarjot Kaur, Sabrina Amft, Daniel Votipka, Yasemin Acar 等USENIX Security 2022
- Weak Programmers Need Not Apply, LLMs Welcome! Survey Screening in the AI EraIta Ryan, Utz Roedig, Klaas-Jan StolICSE 2026
- Robust Methods for Developer Screening in Rapidly Evolving AI ContextsRaphael Serafini, Nino Weber, Asli Yardim, Stefan Albert Horstmann 等CHI 2026 · 被引用 1 次
