Lune

ICSE2021顶会

Do you really code? Designing and Evaluating Screening Questions for Online Surveys with Programmers

Anastasia Danilova, Alena Naiakshina, Stefan Horstmann, Matthew Smith

2021年份
5被引次数
23顶会引用

摘要

Recruiting professional programmers in sufficient numbers for research studies can be challenging because they often cannot spare the time, or due to their geographical distribution and potentially the cost involved. Online platforms such as Clickworker or Qualtrics do provide options to recruit participants with programming skill; however, misunderstandings and fraud can be an issue. This can result in participants without programming skill taking part in studies and surveys. If these participants are not detected, they can cause detrimental noise in the survey data. In this paper, we develop screener questions that are easy and quick to answer for people with programming skill but difficult to answer correctly for those without. In order to evaluate our questionnaire for efficacy and efficiency, we recruited several batches of participants with and without programming skill and tested the questions. In our batch 42% of Clickworkers stating that they have programming skill did not meet our criteria and we would recommend filtering these from studies. We also evaluated the questions in an adversarial setting. We conclude with a set of recommended questions which researchers can use to recruit participants with programming skill from online platforms.

问问这篇 Paper

智能体会读完全文。

Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了最后一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。

可以从这些问题问起

智能体调用

Luneget_paper_fulltext

在 Lune 里问

免费开始,无需绑卡

lune papers fulltext 55f30ecb-d112-48bf-86e7-65eff12da9d5

引用它的顶会 Paper23

问问它们各自怎么用它

它引用的顶会 Paper8

相关 Paper

黄昏的海面,两侧是细线勾勒的悬崖