Do you really code? Designing and Evaluating Screening Questions for Online Surveys with Programmers
Anastasia Danilova, Alena Naiakshina, Stefan Horstmann, Matthew Smith
摘要
Recruiting professional programmers in sufficient numbers for research studies can be challenging because they often cannot spare the time, or due to their geographical distribution and potentially the cost involved. Online platforms such as Clickworker or Qualtrics do provide options to recruit participants with programming skill; however, misunderstandings and fraud can be an issue. This can result in participants without programming skill taking part in studies and surveys. If these participants are not detected, they can cause detrimental noise in the survey data. In this paper, we develop screener questions that are easy and quick to answer for people with programming skill but difficult to answer correctly for those without. In order to evaluate our questionnaire for efficacy and efficiency, we recruited several batches of participants with and without programming skill and tested the questions. In our batch 42% of Clickworkers stating that they have programming skill did not meet our criteria and we would recommend filtering these from studies. We also evaluated the questions in an adversarial setting. We conclude with a set of recommended questions which researchers can use to recruit participants with programming skill from online platforms.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了最后一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper23
- Beyond Bot Detection: Combating Fraudulent Online Survey Takers✱Ziyi Zhang, Shuofei Zhu, Jaron Mink, Aiping Xiong 等WWW 2022 · 被引用 51 次
- Recruiting Participants With Programming Skills: A Comparison of Four Crowdsourcing Platforms and a CS Student Mailing ListMohammad Tahaei, Kami VanieaCHI 2022 · 被引用 45 次
- Stuck in the Permissions With You: Developer & End-User Perspectives on App Permissions & Their Privacy RamificationsMohammad Tahaei, Ruba Abu-Salma, Awais RashidCHI 2023 · 被引用 36 次
- Software security during modern code review: the developer's perspectiveLarissa Braz, Alberto BacchelliFSE 2022 · 被引用 28 次
- How WEIRD is Usable Privacy and Security Research?Ayako Akiyama Hasegawa, Daisuke Inoue, Mitsuaki AkiyamaUSENIX Security 2024 · 被引用 26 次
它引用的顶会 Paper8
- You Get Where You're Looking for: The Impact of Information Sources on Code SecurityYasemin Acar, Michael Backes, Sascha Fahl, Doowon Kim 等S&P 2016 · 被引用 325 次
- Stack Overflow Considered Harmful? The Impact of Copy&Paste on Android Application SecurityFelix Fischer, Konstantin Böttinger, Huang Xiao, Christian Stransky 等S&P 2017 · 被引用 293 次
- Comparing the Usability of Cryptographic APIsYasemin Acar, Michael Backes, Sascha Fahl, Simson L. Garfinkel 等S&P 2017 · 被引用 261 次
- Why Do Developers Get Password Storage Wrong?: A Qualitative Usability StudyAlena Naiakshina, Anastasia Danilova, Christian Tiefenau, Marco Herzog 等CCS 2017 · 被引用 146 次
- On Conducting Security Developer Studies with CS Students: Examining a Password-Storage Study with CS Students, Freelancers, and Company DevelopersAlena Naiakshina, Anastasia Danilova, Eva Gerlitz, Matthew SmithCHI 2020 · 被引用 48 次
相关 Paper
- Testing Time Limits in Screener Questions for Online Surveys with ProgrammersAnastasia Danilova, Stefan Horstmann, Matthew Smith, Alena NaiakshinaICSE 2022 · 被引用 8 次
- Weak Programmers Need Not Apply, LLMs Welcome! Survey Screening in the AI EraIta Ryan, Utz Roedig, Klaas-Jan StolICSE 2026
- Where to Recruit for Security Development Studies: Comparing Six Software Developer SamplesHarjot Kaur, Sabrina Amft, Daniel Votipka, Yasemin Acar 等USENIX Security 2022
- ChatGPT-Resistant Screening Instrument for Identifying Non-ProgrammersRaphael Serafini, Clemens Otto, Stefan Albert Horstmann, Alena NaiakshinaICSE 2024 · 被引用 4 次
- Engaging Company Developers in Security Research Studies: A Comprehensive Literature Review and Quantitative SurveyRaphael Serafini, Stefan Albert Horstmann, Alena NaiakshinaUSENIX Security 2024 · 被引用 7 次
