Understanding fraudulence in online qualitative studies: From the researcher's perspective
Aswati Panicker, Novia Nurain, Zaidat Ibrahim, Chun-Han Ariel Wang, Seung Wan Ha, Yuxing Wu, Kay Connelly, Katie A. Siek, Chia-Fang Chung
摘要
Researchers are increasingly facilitating qualitative research studies online. While this has made research more accessible for participation, there have been notable encounters with “fraudulent” participants. By fraudulent, we refer to individuals who are deceptive about meeting the inclusion criteria, their identity, or experiences. Fraudulent participants have generated new challenges for researchers who have to interact 1:1 with these individuals, face ethical dilemmas on appropriate next steps, diagnose and prevent the issue from happening again, and deal with their own identity as a scholar. In this study, we interview 16 HCI researchers to understand and learn from their experiences. We contribute: (1) an understanding of how HCI qualitative researchers deal with fraudulent participants; (2) a guide for qualitative HCI researchers on how to handle fraudulence; and (3) a reflection on how the HCI research community might better improve our science and training efforts.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper9
- Customizing Emotional Support: How Do Individuals Construct and Interact With LLM-Powered ChatbotsXi Zheng, Zhuoyang Li, Xinning Gui, Yuhan LuoCHI 2025 · 被引用 47 次
- Privacy Perceptions of Custom GPTs by Users and CreatorsRongjun Ma, Caterina Maidhof, Juan Carlos Carrillo, Janne Lindqvist 等CHI 2025 · 被引用 35 次
- Engagements with Generative AI and Personal Health Informatics: Opportunities for Planning, Tracking, Reflecting, and Acting around Personal Health DataShaan Chopra, Katherine Juarez, James Fogarty, Sean A. MunsonUbiComp 2025 · 被引用 11 次
- Mental Health Impacts of AI Companions: Triangulating Social Media Quasi-Experiments, User Perspectives, and Relational LensYunhao Yuan, Jiaxun Zhang, Talayeh Aledavood, Renwen Zhang 等CHI 2026 · 被引用 8 次
- The TaPSI Research Framework - A Systematization of Knowledge on Tangible Privacy and Security InterfacesSarah Delgado Rodriguez, Maximiliane Windl, Florian Alt, Karola MarkyCHI 2025 · 被引用 5 次
它引用的顶会 Paper6
- Using Thematic Analysis in Healthcare HCI at CHI: A Scoping ReviewRobert Bowman, Camille Nadal, Kellie Morrissey, Anja Thieme 等CHI 2023 · 被引用 106 次
- Are Deepfakes Concerning? Analyzing Conversations of Deepfakes on Reddit and Exploring Societal ImplicationsDilrukshi Gamage, Piyush Ghasiya, Vamshi Krishna Bonagiri, Mark E. Whiting 等CHI 2022 · 被引用 77 次
- Standardizing Reporting of Participant Compensation in HCI: A Systematic Literature Review and Recommendations for the FieldJessica Pater, Amanda Coupe, Rachel Pfafman, Chanda Phelan 等CHI 2021 · 被引用 52 次
- Beyond Bot Detection: Combating Fraudulent Online Survey Takers✱Ziyi Zhang, Shuofei Zhu, Jaron Mink, Aiping Xiong 等WWW 2022 · 被引用 51 次
- Using HCI in Cross-Disciplinary Teams: A Case Study of Academic Collaboration in HCI-Health Teams in the US Using a Team Science PerspectiveElena Agapie, Shefali Haldar, Sharmaine Galvez PobleteCSCW 2022 · 被引用 22 次
相关 Paper
- Diagnosing Bias in the Gender Representation of HCI Research Participants: How it Happens and Where We AreAnna Offenwanger, Alan John Milligan, Minsuk Chang, Julia Bullard 等CHI 2021 · 被引用 51 次
- Who Are You Asking?: Qualitative Methods for Involving AAC Users as Primary Research ParticipantsErin BeneteauCHI 2020 · 被引用 28 次
- Why, when, and from whom: considerations for collecting and reporting race and ethnicity data in HCIYiqun T. Chen, Angela D. R. Smith, Katharina Reinecke, Alexandra ToCHI 2023 · 被引用 20 次
- Do you really code? Designing and Evaluating Screening Questions for Online Surveys with ProgrammersAnastasia Danilova, Alena Naiakshina, Stefan Horstmann, Matthew SmithICSE 2021 · 被引用 5 次
- How Design Researchers Interpret Probes: Understanding the Critical Intentions of a Designerly Approach to ResearchSena Çerçi, Marta E. Cecchinato, John VinesCHI 2021 · 被引用 30 次
