How Design Researchers Interpret Probes: Understanding the Critical Intentions of a Designerly Approach to Research
Sena Çerçi, Marta E. Cecchinato, John Vines
摘要
Since entering the HCI lexicon in the 1990s, Probes have been interpreted and used in divergent ways as a designerly approach to research. While originally positioned as a critique of dominant user-research methods, literature on Probes rarely reflects on such critical dimensions nor explicitly articulates the intents of using Probes as research artifacts. We conducted interviews with 12 design researchers who have worked with Probes within diverse Research through Design projects, exploring direct accounts of how and why Probes are used in practice. Our interviews brought to the fore the critical concerns behind Probe practices in relation to the language of Probing, relationships with participants, and motivations to challenge normative practices. While the pluralistic interpretations of Probes offered by our participants brings challenges, we discuss how making visible the critical motivations of our research opens up new ways of practicing and disseminating Probes.
问问这篇 Paper
问问你的智能体。
Lune 读过与它相关的顶会 Paper,每个回答都会注明依据哪几篇。
引用它的顶会 Paper1
问问它们各自怎么用它相关 Paper
- Metaprobes, Metaphysical Workshops and Sketchy PhilosophyEnrique Encinas, Abigail C. Durrant, Robb Mitchell, Mark BlytheCHI 2020 · 被引用 14 次
- Using Cultural Probes in HCI4D/ICTD: A Design Case Study from Bungoma, KenyaSusan WycheCSCW 2020 · 被引用 21 次
- Chatbots for Data Collection in Surveys: A Comparison of Four Theory-Based Interview ProbesRune Møberg Jacobsen, Samuel Rhys Cox, Carla F. Griggio, Niels van BerkelCHI 2025 · 被引用 26 次
- Articulating Experience: Reflections from Experts Applying Micro-Phenomenology to Design Research in HCIMirjana Prpa, Sarah Fdili Alaoui, Thecla Schiphorst, Philippe PasquierCHI 2020 · 被引用 149 次
- Designing Urban Noticing Probes for Community Animals and Cohabitation in TürkiyeSena Cucumak, Özge SubasiCHI 2025 · 被引用 6 次
