Understanding Reconstruction Attacks with the Neural Tangent Kernel and Dataset Distillation
Noel Loo, Ramin M. Hasani, Mathias Lechner, Alexander Amini, Daniela Rus
Abstract
Modern deep learning requires large volumes of data, which could contain sensitive or private information that cannot be leaked. Recent work has shown for homogeneous neural networks a large portion of this training data could be reconstructed with only access to the trained network parameters. While the attack was shown to work empirically, there exists little formal understanding of its effective regime which datapoints are susceptible to reconstruction. In this work, we first build a stronger version of the dataset reconstruction attack and show how it can provably recover the entire training set in the infinite width regime. We then empirically study the characteristics of this attack on two-layer networks and reveal that its success heavily depends on deviations from the frozen infinite-width Neural Tangent Kernel limit. Next, we study the nature of easily-reconstructed images. We show that both theoretically and empirically, reconstructed images tend to"outliers"in the dataset, and that these reconstruction attacks can be used for dataset distillation, that is, we can retrain on reconstructed images and obtain high predictive accuracy.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext f07f37b7-d17f-4b72-b613-fdab02acd611Cited by top-tier papers8
- How Spurious Features are Memorized: Precise Analysis for Random and NTK FeaturesSimone Bombari, Marco MondelliICML 2024 · 10 citations
- On the Ability of Developers' Training Data Preservation of LearnwareHao-Yi Lei, Zhi-Hao Tan, Zhi-Hua ZhouNeurIPS 2024 · 10 citations
- A Law of Data Reconstruction for Random Features (And Beyond)Leonardo Iurada, Simone Bombari, Tatiana Tommasi, Marco MondelliICLR 2026 · 3 citations
- FairDD: Fair Dataset DistillationQihang Zhou, Shenhao Fang, Shibo He, Wenchao Meng et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 3 citations
- No Prior, No Leakage: Revisiting Reconstruction Attacks in Trained Neural NetworksYehonathan Refael, Guy Smorodinsky, Ofir Lindenbaum, Itay SafranICLR 2026 · 1 citation
Builds on29
- Deep Learning with Differential PrivacyMartín Abadi, Andy Chu, Ian J. Goodfellow, H. Brendan McMahan et al.CCS 2016 · 7,620 citations
- Membership Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning ModelsReza Shokri, Marco Stronati, Congzheng Song, Vitaly ShmatikovS&P 2017 · 5,137 citations
- The Secret Sharer: Evaluating and Testing Unintended Memorization in Neural NetworksNicholas Carlini, Chang Liu, Úlfar Erlingsson, Jernej Kos et al.USENIX Security 2019 · 1,386 citations
- Machine UnlearningLucas Bourtoule, Varun Chandrasekaran, Christopher A. Choquette-Choo, Hengrui Jia et al.S&P 2021 · 1,381 citations
- Membership Inference Attacks From First PrinciplesNicholas Carlini, Steve Chien, Milad Nasr, Shuang Song et al.S&P 2022 · 1,049 citations
Related papers
- Reconstructing Training Data From Trained Neural NetworksNiv Haim, Gal Vardi, Gilad Yehudai, Ohad Shamir et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 196 citations
- Reconstructing Training Data with Informed AdversariesBorja Balle, Giovanni Cherubin, Jamie HayesS&P 2022 · 214 citations
- Leak and Learn: An Attacker's Cookbook to Train Using Leaked Data from Federated LearningJoshua C. Zhao, Ahaan Dabholkar, Atul Sharma, Saurabh BagchiCVPR 2024 · 4 citations
- Knowledge-Enriched Distributional Model Inversion AttacksSi Chen, Mostafa Kahla, Ruoxi Jia, Guo-Jun QiICCV 2021 · 124 citations
- Variational Model Inversion AttacksKuan-Chieh Wang, Yan Fu, Ke Li, Ashish Khisti et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 142 citations
