Reconstructing Training Data From Trained Neural Networks
Niv Haim, Gal Vardi, Gilad Yehudai, Ohad Shamir, Michal Irani
Abstract
Project page: https://giladude1.github.io/reconstruction Understanding to what extent neural networks memorize training data is an intriguing question with practical and theoretical implications. In this paper we show that in some cases a significant fraction of the training data can in fact be reconstructed from the parameters of a trained neural network classifier. We propose a novel reconstruction scheme that stems from recent theoretical results about the implicit bias in training neural networks with gradient-based methods. To the best of our knowledge, our results are the first to show that reconstructing a large portion of the actual training samples from a trained neural network classifier is generally possible. This has negative implications on privacy, as it can be used as an attack for revealing sensitive training data. We demonstrate our method for binary MLP classifiers on a few standard computer vision datasets.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 6c2762c9-a159-417d-a109-5e62653532dfCited by top-tier papers55
- Differentially Private Optimization on Large Model at Small CostZhiqi Bu, Yu-Xiang Wang, Sheng Zha, George KarypisICML 2023 · 85 citations
- Can Neural Network Memorization Be Localized?Pratyush Maini, Michael Curtis Mozer, Hanie Sedghi, Zachary Chase Lipton et al.ICML 2023 · 82 citations
- Bounding training data reconstruction in DP-SGDJamie Hayes, Borja Balle, Saeed MahloujifarNeurIPS 2023 · 73 citations
- Differentially Private Synthetic Data via Foundation Model APIs 1: ImagesZinan Lin, Sivakanth Gopi, Janardhan Kulkarni, Harsha Nori et al.ICLR 2024 · 63 citations
- Differentially Private Bias-Term Fine-tuning of Foundation ModelsZhiqi Bu, Yu-Xiang Wang, Sheng Zha, George KarypisICML 2024 · 59 citations
Builds on31
- Deep Learning with Differential PrivacyMartín Abadi, Andy Chu, Ian J. Goodfellow, H. Brendan McMahan et al.CCS 2016 · 7,620 citations
- Membership Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning ModelsReza Shokri, Marco Stronati, Congzheng Song, Vitaly ShmatikovS&P 2017 · 5,137 citations
- Extracting Training Data from Large Language ModelsNicholas Carlini, Florian Tramèr, Eric Wallace, Matthew Jagielski et al.USENIX Security 2021 · 2,866 citations
- Stealing Machine Learning Models via Prediction APIsFlorian Tramèr, Fan Zhang, Ari Juels, Michael K. Reiter et al.USENIX Security 2016 · 2,088 citations
- Exploiting Unintended Feature Leakage in Collaborative LearningLuca Melis, Congzheng Song, Emiliano De Cristofaro, Vitaly ShmatikovS&P 2019 · 1,736 citations
Related papers
- No Prior, No Leakage: Revisiting Reconstruction Attacks in Trained Neural NetworksYehonathan Refael, Guy Smorodinsky, Ofir Lindenbaum, Itay SafranICLR 2026 · 1 citation
- Deconstructing Data Reconstruction: Multiclass, Weight Decay and General LossesGon Buzaglo, Niv Haim, Gilad Yehudai, Gal Vardi et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 32 citations
- Reconstructing Training Data with Informed AdversariesBorja Balle, Giovanni Cherubin, Jamie HayesS&P 2022 · 214 citations
- Inverting Gradients - How easy is it to break privacy in federated learning?Jonas Geiping, Hartmut Bauermeister, Hannah Dröge, Michael MoellerNeurIPS 2020 · 1,822 citations
- Understanding Reconstruction Attacks with the Neural Tangent Kernel and Dataset DistillationNoel Loo, Ramin M. Hasani, Mathias Lechner, Alexander Amini et al.ICLR 2024 · 14 citations
