No Prior, No Leakage: Revisiting Reconstruction Attacks in Trained Neural Networks
Yehonathan Refael, Guy Smorodinsky, Ofir Lindenbaum, Itay Safran
Abstract
The memorization of training data by neural networks raises pressing concerns for privacy and security. Recent work has shown that, under certain conditions, portions of the training set can be reconstructed directly from model parameters. Some of these methods exploit implicit bias toward margin maximization, suggesting that properties often regarded as beneficial for generalization may actually compromise privacy. Yet despite striking empirical demonstrations, the reliability of these attacks remains poorly understood and lacks a solid theoretical foundation. In this work, we take a complementary perspective: rather than designing stronger attacks, we analyze the inherent weaknesses and limitations of existing reconstruction methods and identify conditions under which they fail. We rigorously prove that, without incorporating prior knowledge about the data, there exist infinitely many alternative solutions that may lie arbitrarily far from the true training set, rendering reconstruction fundamentally unreliable. Empirically, we further demonstrate that exact duplication of training examples occurs only by chance. Our results refine the theoretical understanding of when training set leakage is possible and offer new insights into mitigating reconstruction attacks. Remarkably, we demonstrate that networks trained more extensively, and therefore satisfying implicit bias conditions more strongly -are, in fact, less susceptible to reconstruction attacks, reconciling privacy with the need for strong generalization in this setting. * Equal contribution.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 63153432-21d0-48dc-bdb5-9222bdd8a64eBuilds on18
- Deep Learning with Differential PrivacyMartín Abadi, Andy Chu, Ian J. Goodfellow, H. Brendan McMahan et al.CCS 2016 · 7,620 citations
- Extracting Training Data from Large Language ModelsNicholas Carlini, Florian Tramèr, Eric Wallace, Matthew Jagielski et al.USENIX Security 2021 · 2,866 citations
- Inverting Gradients - How easy is it to break privacy in federated learning?Jonas Geiping, Hartmut Bauermeister, Hannah Dröge, Michael MoellerNeurIPS 2020 · 1,822 citations
- Deep Models Under the GAN: Information Leakage from Collaborative Deep LearningBriland Hitaj, Giuseppe Ateniese, Fernando Pérez-CruzCCS 2017 · 1,581 citations
- The Secret Sharer: Evaluating and Testing Unintended Memorization in Neural NetworksNicholas Carlini, Chang Liu, Úlfar Erlingsson, Jernej Kos et al.USENIX Security 2019 · 1,386 citations
Related papers
- Reconstructing Training Data From Trained Neural NetworksNiv Haim, Gal Vardi, Gilad Yehudai, Ohad Shamir et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 196 citations
- Reconstructing Training Data with Informed AdversariesBorja Balle, Giovanni Cherubin, Jamie HayesS&P 2022 · 214 citations
- Understanding Reconstruction Attacks with the Neural Tangent Kernel and Dataset DistillationNoel Loo, Ramin M. Hasani, Mathias Lechner, Alexander Amini et al.ICLR 2024 · 14 citations
- Reducing information dependency does not cause training data privacy. Adversarially non-robust features do.Rasmus Torp, Shailen Smith, Adam BreuerICLR 2026 · 1 citation
- Deconstructing Data Reconstruction: Multiclass, Weight Decay and General LossesGon Buzaglo, Niv Haim, Gilad Yehudai, Gal Vardi et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 32 citations
