Leak and Learn: An Attacker's Cookbook to Train Using Leaked Data from Federated Learning
Joshua C. Zhao, Ahaan Dabholkar, Atul Sharma, Saurabh Bagchi
Abstract
Federated learning is a decentralized learning paradigm introduced to preserve privacy of client data. Despite this, prior work has shown that an attacker at the server can still reconstruct the private training data using only the client updates. These attacks are known as data reconstruction attacks and fall into two major categories: gradient inversion (GI) and linear layer leakage attacks (LLL). However, despite demonstrating the effectiveness of these attacks in breaching privacy, prior work has not investigated the usefulness of the reconstructed data for downstream tasks. In this work, we explore data reconstruction attacks through the lens of training and improving models with leaked data. We demonstrate the effectiveness of both GI and LLL attacks in maliciously training models using the leaked data more accurately than a benign federated learning strategy. Counter-intuitively, this bump in training quality can occur despite limited reconstruction quality or a small total number of leaked images. Finally, we show the limitations of these attacks for downstream training, individually for GI attacks and for LLL attacks.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext d3f665f9-16c1-4b6d-a2fd-3e2e8d340428Cited by top-tier papers2
- Federated Graph Learning under Domain Shift with Generalizable PrototypesGuancheng Wan, Wenke Huang, Mang YeAAAI 2024 · 70 citations
- FedSPA: Generalizable Federated Graph Learning under Homophily HeterogeneityZihan Tan, Guancheng Wan, Wenke Huang, He Li et al.CVPR 2025
Builds on19
- Membership Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning ModelsReza Shokri, Marco Stronati, Congzheng Song, Vitaly ShmatikovS&P 2017 · 5,137 citations
- Practical Secure Aggregation for Privacy-Preserving Machine LearningKallista A. Bonawitz, Vladimir Ivanov, Ben Kreuter, Antonio Marcedone et al.CCS 2017 · 3,936 citations
- Inverting Gradients - How easy is it to break privacy in federated learning?Jonas Geiping, Hartmut Bauermeister, Hannah Dröge, Michael MoellerNeurIPS 2020 · 1,822 citations
- Comprehensive Privacy Analysis of Deep Learning: Passive and Active White-box Inference Attacks against Centralized and Federated LearningMilad Nasr, Reza Shokri, Amir HoumansadrS&P 2019 · 1,778 citations
- Exploiting Unintended Feature Leakage in Collaborative LearningLuca Melis, Congzheng Song, Emiliano De Cristofaro, Vitaly ShmatikovS&P 2019 · 1,736 citations
Related papers
- Loki: Large-scale Data Reconstruction Attack against Federated Learning through Model ManipulationJoshua C. Zhao, Atul Sharma, Ahmed Roushdy Elkordy, Yahya H. Ezzeldin et al.S&P 2024 · 64 citations
- Recovering Labels from Local Updates in Federated LearningHuancheng Chen, Haris VikaloICML 2024 · 9 citations
- Dropout Is NOT All You Need to Prevent Gradient LeakageDaniel Scheliga, Patrick Maeder, Marco SeelandAAAI 2023 · 22 citations
- Soteria: Provable Defense Against Privacy Leakage in Federated Learning From Representation PerspectiveJingwei Sun, Ang Li, Binghui Wang, Huanrui Yang et al.CVPR 2021
- Attribute Inference Attacks for Federated Regression TasksFrancesco Diana, Othmane Marfoq, Chuan Xu, Giovanni Neglia et al.AAAI 2025 · 2 citations
