Modeling Persuasive Discourse to Adaptively Support Students' Argumentative Writing
Thiemo Wambsganss, Christina Niklaus
Abstract
We introduce an argumentation annotation approach to model the structure of argumentative discourse in student-written business model pitches. Additionally, the annotation scheme captures a series of persuasiveness scores such as the specificity, strength, evidence, and relevance of the pitch and the individual components. Based on this scheme, we annotated a corpus of 200 business model pitches in German. Moreover, we trained predictive models to detect argumentative discourse structures and embedded them in an adaptive writing support system for students that provides them with individual argumentation feedback independent of an instructor, time, and location. We evaluated our tool in a real-world writing exercise and found promising results for the measured self-efficacy and perceived ease-of-use. Finally, we present our freely available corpus of persuasive business model pitches with 3,207 annotated sentences in German language and our annotation guidelines.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext d89525c8-9cb4-4e50-af5e-265b8fce3b9aCited by top-tier papers5
- A Design Space for Intelligent and Interactive Writing AssistantsMina Lee, Katy Ilonka Gero, John Joon Young Chung, Simon Buckingham Shum et al.CHI 2024 · 133 citations
- "Ronaldo's a poser!": How the Use of Generative AI Shapes Debates in Online ForumsYuhan Zeng, Yingxuan Shi, Xuehan Huang, Fiona Nah et al.CHI 2025 · 21 citations
- Designing Conversational Evaluation Tools: A Comparison of Text and Voice Modalities to Improve Response Quality in Course EvaluationsThiemo Wambsganss, Naim Zierau, Matthias Söllner, Tanja Käser et al.CSCW 2022 · 17 citations
- Let's discuss! Quality Dimensions and Annotated Datasets for Computational Argument Quality AssessmentRositsa V. Ivanova, Thomas Huber, Christina NiklausEMNLP 2024 · 2 citations
- Towards Comprehensive Argument Analysis in Education: Dataset, Tasks, and MethodYupei Ren, Xinyi Zhou, Ning Zhang, Shangqing Zhao et al.ACL 2025
Builds on2
- ArgueTutor: An Adaptive Dialog-Based Learning System for Argumentation SkillsThiemo Wambsganss, Tobias Kueng, Matthias Söllner, Jan Marco LeimeisterCHI 2021 · 126 citations
- AL: An Adaptive Learning Support System for Argumentation SkillsThiemo Wambsganss, Christina Niklaus, Matthias Cetto, Matthias Söllner et al.CHI 2020 · 98 citations
Related papers
- Supporting Cognitive and Emotional Empathic Writing of StudentsThiemo Wambsganss, Christina Niklaus, Matthias Söllner, Siegfried Handschuh et al.ACL 2021
- Improving Students Argumentation Learning with Adaptive Self-Evaluation NudgingThiemo Wambsganss, Andreas Janson, Tanja Käser, Jan Marco LeimeisterCSCW 2022 · 20 citations
- Leveraging Learner Errors in Digital Argumentation Learning: How ALure Helps Students Learn from their Mistakes and Write Better ArgumentsSeyed Parsa Neshaei, Antonia Tolzin, Yvonne Berkle, Miriam Leuchter et al.CSCW 2025 · 5 citations
- LegalWriter: An Intelligent Writing Support System for Structured and Persuasive Legal Case Writing for Novice Law StudentsFlorian Weber, Thiemo Wambsganss, Seyed Parsa Neshaei, Matthias SöllnerCHI 2024 · 15 citations
- Adaptive Empathy Learning Support in Peer Review ScenariosThiemo Wambsganss, Matthias Söllner, Kenneth R. Koedinger, Jan Marco LeimeisterCHI 2022 · 23 citations
