Supporting Cognitive and Emotional Empathic Writing of Students
Thiemo Wambsganss, Christina Niklaus, Matthias Söllner, Siegfried Handschuh, Jan Marco Leimeister
Abstract
We present an annotation approach to capturing emotional and cognitive empathy in student-written peer reviews on business models in German. We propose an annotation scheme that allows us to model emotional and cognitive empathy scores based on three types of review components. Also, we conducted an annotation study with three annotators based on 92 student essays to evaluate our annotation scheme. The obtained inter-rater agreement of α=0.79 for the components and the multi-π=0.41 for the empathy scores indicate that the proposed annotation scheme successfully guides annotators to a substantial to moderate agreement. Moreover, we trained predictive models to detect the annotated empathy structures and embedded them in an adaptive writing support system for students to receive individual empathy feedback independent of an instructor, time, and location. We evaluated our tool in a peer learning exercise with 58 students and found promising results for perceived empathy skill learning, perceived feedback accuracy, and intention to use. Finally, we present our freely available corpus of 500 empathy-annotated, student-written peer reviews on business models and our annotation guidelines to encourage future research on the design and development of empathy support systems.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 6ebd7034-cbd4-4431-b553-80994dc97d72Cited by top-tier papers3
- A Design Space for Intelligent and Interactive Writing AssistantsMina Lee, Katy Ilonka Gero, John Joon Young Chung, Simon Buckingham Shum et al.CHI 2024 · 133 citations
- Designing Conversational Evaluation Tools: A Comparison of Text and Voice Modalities to Improve Response Quality in Course EvaluationsThiemo Wambsganss, Naim Zierau, Matthias Söllner, Tanja Käser et al.CSCW 2022 · 17 citations
- The Practical Impacts of Theoretical Constructs on Empathy ModelingAllison Lahnala, Charles Welch, David Jurgens, Lucie FlekEMNLP 2025
Builds on2
- ArgueTutor: An Adaptive Dialog-Based Learning System for Argumentation SkillsThiemo Wambsganss, Tobias Kueng, Matthias Söllner, Jan Marco LeimeisterCHI 2021 · 126 citations
- A Computational Approach to Understanding Empathy Expressed in Text-Based Mental Health SupportAshish Sharma, Adam S. Miner, David C. Atkins, Tim AlthoffEMNLP 2020 · 21 citations
Related papers
- Adaptive Empathy Learning Support in Peer Review ScenariosThiemo Wambsganss, Matthias Söllner, Kenneth R. Koedinger, Jan Marco LeimeisterCHI 2022 · 23 citations
- Modeling Persuasive Discourse to Adaptively Support Students' Argumentative WritingThiemo Wambsganss, Christina NiklausACL 2022 · 25 citations
- AnnotateGPT: Designing Human-AI Collaboration in Pen-Based Document AnnotationBenedict Leung, Mariana Shimabukuro, Christopher CollinsCHI 2026 · 1 citation
- Adaptive Tutoring Modalities for Supporting Learners' Reflective Writing PracticesLéane Wettstein, Seyed Parsa Neshaei, Roman Rietsche, Thiemo WambsganssCHI 2026 · 1 citation
- Intelligent Support Engages Writers Through Relevant Cognitive ProcessesAndreas Göldi, Thiemo Wambsganss, Seyed Parsa Neshaei, Roman RietscheCHI 2024 · 20 citations
