Let's discuss! Quality Dimensions and Annotated Datasets for Computational Argument Quality Assessment

Research in the computational assessment of Argumentation Quality has gained popularity over the last ten years. Various quality dimensions have been explored through the creation of domain-specific datasets and assessment methods. We survey the related literature (211 publications and 32 datasets), while addressing potential overlaps and blurry boundaries to related domains. This paper provides a representative overview of the state of the art in Computational Argument Quality Assessment with a focus on annotated datasets. The aim of the survey is to identify research gaps and to aid future discussions and work in the domain.