ElliCE: Efficient and Provably Robust Algorithmic Recourse via the Rashomon Sets
Bohdan Turbal, Iryna Voitsitska, Lesia Semenova
Abstract
Machine learning models now influence decisions that directly affect people's lives, making it important to understand not only their predictions, but also how individuals could act to obtain better results. Algorithmic recourse provides actionable input modifications to achieve more favorable outcomes, typically relying on counterfactual explanations to suggest such changes. However, when the Rashomon set - the set of near-optimal models - is large, standard counterfactual explanations can become unreliable, as a recourse action valid for one model may fail under another. We introduce ElliCE, a novel framework for robust algorithmic recourse that optimizes counterfactuals over an ellipsoidal approximation of the Rashomon set. The resulting explanations are provably valid over this ellipsoid, with theoretical guarantees on uniqueness, stability, and alignment with key feature directions. Empirically, ElliCE generates counterfactuals that are not only more robust but also more flexible, adapting to user-specified feature constraints while being substantially faster than existing baselines. This provides a principled and practical solution for reliable recourse under model uncertainty, ensuring stable recommendations for users even as models evolve.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext d4d3435f-bd8e-4473-9f22-6cc4fccfb97eCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on18
- Neural Additive Models: Interpretable Machine Learning with Neural NetsRishabh Agarwal, Levi Melnick, Nicholas Frosst, Xuezhou Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 663 citations
- Predictive Multiplicity in ClassificationCharles T. Marx, Flávio P. Calmon, Berk UstunICML 2020 · 197 citations
- Towards Robust and Reliable Algorithmic RecourseSohini Upadhyay, Shalmali Joshi, Himabindu LakkarajuNeurIPS 2021 · 145 citations
- Exploring the Whole Rashomon Set of Sparse Decision TreesRui Xin, Chudi Zhong, Zhi Chen, Takuya Takagi et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 117 citations
- Robust Counterfactual Explanations for Tree-Based EnsemblesSanghamitra Dutta, Jason Long, Saumitra Mishra, Cecilia Tilli et al.ICML 2022 · 73 citations
Related papers
- Distributionally Robust Recourse ActionDuy Nguyen, Ngoc Bui, Viet Anh NguyenICLR 2023 · 1 citation
- Learning Models for Actionable RecourseAlexis Ross, Himabindu Lakkaraju, Osbert BastaniNeurIPS 2021 · 25 citations
- Performative Validity of Recourse ExplanationsGunnar König, Hidde Fokkema, Timo Freiesleben, Celestine Mendler-Dünner et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 12 citations
- Probabilistically Robust Recourse: Navigating the Trade-offs between Costs and Robustness in Algorithmic RecourseMartin Pawelczyk, Teresa Datta, Johannes van den Heuvel, Gjergji Kasneci et al.ICLR 2023 · 13 citations
- On the Adversarial Robustness of Causal Algorithmic RecourseRicardo Dominguez-Olmedo, Amir-Hossein Karimi, Bernhard SchölkopfICML 2022 · 80 citations
