On the Adversarial Robustness of Causal Algorithmic Recourse
Ricardo Dominguez-Olmedo, Amir-Hossein Karimi, Bernhard Schölkopf
Abstract
Algorithmic recourse seeks to provide actionable recommendations for individuals to overcome unfavorable classification outcomes from automated decision-making systems. Recourse recommendations should ideally be robust to reasonably small uncertainty in the features of the individual seeking recourse. In this work, we formulate the adversarially robust recourse problem and show that recourse methods that offer minimally costly recourse fail to be robust. We then present methods for generating adversarially robust recourse for linear and for differentiable classifiers. Finally, we show that regularizing the decision-making classifier to behave locally linearly and to rely more strongly on actionable features facilitates the existence of adversarially robust recourse.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 3f7f735b-6acd-4a49-b402-84a42f876a7bCited by top-tier papers20
- Robust Counterfactual Explanations for Neural Networks With Probabilistic GuaranteesFaisal Hamman, Erfaun Noorani, Saumitra Mishra, Daniele Magazzeni et al.ICML 2023 · 54 citations
- GLOBE-CE: A Translation Based Approach for Global Counterfactual ExplanationsDan Ley, Saumitra Mishra, Daniele MagazzeniICML 2023 · 30 citations
- Improvement-Focused Causal Recourse (ICR)Gunnar König, Timo Freiesleben, Moritz Grosse-WentrupAAAI 2023 · 21 citations
- The Utility of "Even if" Semifactual Explanation to Optimise Positive OutcomesEoin M. Kenny, Weipeng HuangNeurIPS 2023 · 16 citations
- Probabilistically Robust Recourse: Navigating the Trade-offs between Costs and Robustness in Algorithmic RecourseMartin Pawelczyk, Teresa Datta, Johannes van den Heuvel, Gjergji Kasneci et al.ICLR 2023 · 13 citations
Builds on7
- Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural NetworksNicholas Carlini, David A. WagnerS&P 2017 · 9,786 citations
- Algorithmic recourse under imperfect causal knowledge: a probabilistic approachAmir-Hossein Karimi, Bodo Julius von Kügelgen, Bernhard Schölkopf, Isabel ValeraNeurIPS 2020 · 224 citations
- Counterfactual Explanations Can Be ManipulatedDylan Slack, Anna Hilgard, Himabindu Lakkaraju, Sameer SinghNeurIPS 2021 · 182 citations
- On the Fairness of Causal Algorithmic RecourseJulius von Kügelgen, Amir-Hossein Karimi, Umang Bhatt, Isabel Valera et al.AAAI 2022 · 99 citations
- Consistent Counterfactuals for Deep ModelsEmily Black, Zifan Wang, Matt FredriksonICLR 2022 · 56 citations
Related papers
- From Search to Sampling: Generative Models for Robust Algorithmic RecoursePrateek Garg, Lokesh Nagalapatti, Sunita SarawagiICLR 2025
- Towards Robust and Reliable Algorithmic RecourseSohini Upadhyay, Shalmali Joshi, Himabindu LakkarajuNeurIPS 2021 · 145 citations
- Distributionally Robust Recourse ActionDuy Nguyen, Ngoc Bui, Viet Anh NguyenICLR 2023 · 1 citation
- SafeAR: Safe Algorithmic Recourse by Risk-Aware PoliciesHaochen Wu, Shubham Sharma, Sunandita Patra, Sriram GopalakrishnanAAAI 2024 · 1 citation
- Learning Decision Trees and Forests with Algorithmic RecourseKentaro Kanamori, Takuya Takagi, Ken Kobayashi, Yuichi IkeICML 2024 · 4 citations
