Distributionally Robust Recourse Action
Duy Nguyen, Ngoc Bui, Viet Anh Nguyen
Abstract
A recourse action aims to explain a particular algorithmic decision by showing one specific way in which the instance could be modified to receive an alternate outcome. Existing recourse generation methods often assume that the machine learning model does not change over time. However, this assumption does not always hold in practice because of data distribution shifts, and in this case, the recourse action may become invalid. To redress this shortcoming, we propose the Distributionally Robust Recourse Action (DiRRAc) framework, which generates a recourse action that has a high probability of being valid under a mixture of model shifts. We formulate the robustified recourse setup as a min-max optimization problem, where the max problem is specified by Gelbrich distance over an ambiguity set around the distribution of model parameters. Then we suggest a projected gradient descent algorithm to find a robust recourse according to the min-max objective. We show that our DiRRAc framework can be extended to hedge against the misspecification of the mixture weights. Numerical experiments with both synthetic and three real-world datasets demonstrate the benefits of our proposed framework over state-of-the-art recourse methods.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 39e192f2-b002-4dfc-8c2d-98f529304d67Cited by top-tier papers3
- Performative Validity of Recourse ExplanationsGunnar König, Hidde Fokkema, Timo Freiesleben, Celestine Mendler-Dünner et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 12 citations
- SafeAR: Safe Algorithmic Recourse by Risk-Aware PoliciesHaochen Wu, Shubham Sharma, Sunandita Patra, Sriram GopalakrishnanAAAI 2024 · 1 citation
- Feature Responsiveness Scores: Model-Agnostic Explanations for RecourseSeung Hyun Cheon, Anneke Wernerfelt, Sorelle A. Friedler, Berk UstunICLR 2025
Builds on5
- Towards Robust and Reliable Algorithmic RecourseSohini Upadhyay, Shalmali Joshi, Himabindu LakkarajuNeurIPS 2021 · 145 citations
- Beyond Individualized Recourse: Interpretable and Interactive Summaries of Actionable RecoursesKaivalya Rawal, Himabindu LakkarajuNeurIPS 2020 · 113 citations
- Consistent Counterfactuals for Deep ModelsEmily Black, Zifan Wang, Matt FredriksonICLR 2022 · 56 citations
- Counterfactual Plans under Distributional AmbiguityNgoc Bui, Duy Nguyen, Viet Anh NguyenICLR 2022 · 26 citations
- Sequential Domain Adaptation by Synthesizing Distributionally Robust ExpertsBahar Taskesen, Man-Chung Yue, Jose H. Blanchet, Daniel Kuhn et al.ICML 2021 · 24 citations
Related papers
- ElliCE: Efficient and Provably Robust Algorithmic Recourse via the Rashomon SetsBohdan Turbal, Iryna Voitsitska, Lesia SemenovaNeurIPS 2025 · 6 citations
- On the Adversarial Robustness of Causal Algorithmic RecourseRicardo Dominguez-Olmedo, Amir-Hossein Karimi, Bernhard SchölkopfICML 2022 · 80 citations
- Learning Gradient Boosted Decision Trees with Algorithmic RecourseKentaro Kanamori, Ken Kobayashi, Takuya TakagiNeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations
- Probabilistically Robust Recourse: Navigating the Trade-offs between Costs and Robustness in Algorithmic RecourseMartin Pawelczyk, Teresa Datta, Johannes van den Heuvel, Gjergji Kasneci et al.ICLR 2023 · 13 citations
- From Search to Sampling: Generative Models for Robust Algorithmic RecoursePrateek Garg, Lokesh Nagalapatti, Sunita SarawagiICLR 2025
