Learning Gradient Boosted Decision Trees with Algorithmic Recourse
Kentaro Kanamori, Ken Kobayashi, Takuya Takagi
Abstract
This paper proposes a new algorithm for learning gradient boosted decision trees while ensuring the existence of recourse actions. Algorithmic recourse aims to provide a recourse action for altering the undesired prediction result given by a model. While existing studies often focus on extracting valid and executable actions from a given learned model, such reasonable actions do not always exist for models optimized solely for predictive accuracy. To address this issue, recent studies proposed a framework for learning a model while guaranteeing the existence of reasonable actions with high probability. However, these methods can not be applied to gradient boosted decision trees, which are renowned as one of the most popular models for tabular datasets. We propose an efficient gradient boosting algorithm that takes recourse guarantee into account, while maintaining the same time complexity as the standard ones. We also propose a post-processing method for refining a learned model under the constraint of a recourse guarantee and provide a PAC-style analysis of the refined model. Experimental results demonstrated that our method successfully provided reasonable actions to more instances than the baselines without significantly degrading accuracy and computational efficiency.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 9c9db114-7769-4eec-8bf3-e871ee89166aCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on20
- Better by default: Strong pre-tuned MLPs and boosted trees on tabular dataDavid Holzmüller, Léo Grinsztajn, Ingo SteinwartNeurIPS 2024 · 141 citations
- Beyond Individualized Recourse: Interpretable and Interactive Summaries of Actionable RecoursesKaivalya Rawal, Himabindu LakkarajuNeurIPS 2020 · 113 citations
- FOCUS: Flexible Optimizable Counterfactual Explanations for Tree EnsemblesAna Lucic, Harrie Oosterhuis, Hinda Haned, Maarten de RijkeAAAI 2022 · 87 citations
- On the Adversarial Robustness of Causal Algorithmic RecourseRicardo Dominguez-Olmedo, Amir-Hossein Karimi, Bernhard SchölkopfICML 2022 · 80 citations
- Robust Counterfactual Explanations for Tree-Based EnsemblesSanghamitra Dutta, Jason Long, Saumitra Mishra, Cecilia Tilli et al.ICML 2022 · 73 citations
Related papers
- Learning Decision Trees and Forests with Algorithmic RecourseKentaro Kanamori, Takuya Takagi, Ken Kobayashi, Yuichi IkeICML 2024 · 4 citations
- Distributionally Robust Recourse ActionDuy Nguyen, Ngoc Bui, Viet Anh NguyenICLR 2023 · 1 citation
- Learning Models for Actionable RecourseAlexis Ross, Himabindu Lakkaraju, Osbert BastaniNeurIPS 2021 · 25 citations
- Improvement-Focused Causal Recourse (ICR)Gunnar König, Timo Freiesleben, Moritz Grosse-WentrupAAAI 2023 · 21 citations
- Probabilistically Robust Recourse: Navigating the Trade-offs between Costs and Robustness in Algorithmic RecourseMartin Pawelczyk, Teresa Datta, Johannes van den Heuvel, Gjergji Kasneci et al.ICLR 2023 · 13 citations
