Learning Models for Actionable Recourse
Alexis Ross, Himabindu Lakkaraju, Osbert Bastani
Abstract
As machine learning models are increasingly deployed in high-stakes domains such as legal and financial decision-making, there has been growing interest in post-hoc methods for generating counterfactual explanations. Such explanations provide individuals adversely impacted by predicted outcomes (e.g., an applicant denied a loan) with recourse -- i.e., a description of how they can change their features to obtain a positive outcome. We propose a novel algorithm that leverages adversarial training and PAC confidence sets to learn models that theoretically guarantee recourse to affected individuals with high probability without sacrificing accuracy. We demonstrate the efficacy of our approach via extensive experiments on real data.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 546e7ac2-626e-4122-922f-bf6fc19383ccCited by top-tier papers11
- On the Adversarial Robustness of Causal Algorithmic RecourseRicardo Dominguez-Olmedo, Amir-Hossein Karimi, Bernhard SchölkopfICML 2022 · 80 citations
- Making Sense of Dependence: Efficient Black-box Explanations Using Dependence MeasurePaul Novello, Thomas Fel, David VigourouxNeurIPS 2022 · 48 citations
- CounterNet: End-to-End Training of Prediction Aware Counterfactual ExplanationsHangzhi Guo, Thanh Hong Nguyen, Amulya YadavKDD 2023 · 12 citations
- On the explainable properties of 1-Lipschitz Neural Networks: An Optimal Transport PerspectiveMathieu Serrurier, Franck Mamalet, Thomas Fel, Louis Béthune et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 11 citations
- Wasserstein Distributionally Robust Optimization through the Lens of Structural Causal Models and Individual FairnessAhmad-Reza Ehyaei, Golnoosh Farnadi, Samira SamadiNeurIPS 2024 · 5 citations
Builds on3
- Algorithmic recourse under imperfect causal knowledge: a probabilistic approachAmir-Hossein Karimi, Bodo Julius von Kügelgen, Bernhard Schölkopf, Isabel ValeraNeurIPS 2020 · 224 citations
- Robust and Stable Black Box ExplanationsHimabindu Lakkaraju, Nino Arsov, Osbert BastaniICML 2020 · 93 citations
- PAC Confidence Sets for Deep Neural Networks via Calibrated PredictionSangdon Park, Osbert Bastani, Nikolai Matni, Insup LeeICLR 2020 · 77 citations
Related papers
- Towards Robust and Reliable Algorithmic RecourseSohini Upadhyay, Shalmali Joshi, Himabindu LakkarajuNeurIPS 2021 · 145 citations
- Probabilistically Robust Recourse: Navigating the Trade-offs between Costs and Robustness in Algorithmic RecourseMartin Pawelczyk, Teresa Datta, Johannes van den Heuvel, Gjergji Kasneci et al.ICLR 2023 · 13 citations
- Prediction without Preclusion: Recourse Verification with Reachable SetsAvni Kothari, Bogdan Kulynych, Tsui-Wei Weng, Berk UstunICLR 2024 · 7 citations
- ElliCE: Efficient and Provably Robust Algorithmic Recourse via the Rashomon SetsBohdan Turbal, Iryna Voitsitska, Lesia SemenovaNeurIPS 2025 · 6 citations
- Performative Validity of Recourse ExplanationsGunnar König, Hidde Fokkema, Timo Freiesleben, Celestine Mendler-Dünner et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 12 citations
