Wasserstein Distributionally Robust Optimization through the Lens of Structural Causal Models and Individual Fairness
Ahmad-Reza Ehyaei, Golnoosh Farnadi, Samira Samadi
Abstract
In recent years, Wasserstein Distributionally Robust Optimization (DRO) has garnered substantial interest for its efficacy in data-driven decision-making under distributional uncertainty. However, limited research has explored the application of DRO to address individual fairness concerns, particularly when considering causal structures and sensitive attributes in learning problems. To address this gap, we first formulate the DRO problem from causality and individual fairness perspectives. We then present the DRO dual formulation as an efficient tool to convert the DRO problem into a more tractable and computationally efficient form. Next, we characterize the closed form of the approximate worst-case loss quantity as a regularizer, eliminating the max-step in the min-max DRO problem. We further estimate the regularizer in more general cases and explore the relationship between DRO and classical robust optimization. Finally, by removing the assumption of a known structural causal model, we provide finite sample error bounds when designing DRO with empirical distributions and estimated causal structures to ensure efficiency and robust learning.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 190bef91-ba0c-4d15-9702-548b725fe7b2Cited by top-tier papers3
- FedFACT: A Provable Framework for Controllable Group-Fairness Calibration in Federated LearningLi Zhang, Zhongxuan Han, Xiaohua Feng, Jiaming Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations
- Argumentative Debates for Transparent Bias DetectionHamed Ayoobi, Nico Potyka, Anna Rapberger, Francesca ToniAAAI 2026 · 2 citations
- Collective Counterfactual Explanations: Balancing Individual Goals and Collective DynamicsAhmad-Reza Ehyaei, Ali Shirali, Samira SamadiNeurIPS 2025 · 1 citation
Builds on12
- Training individually fair ML models with sensitive subspace robustnessMikhail Yurochkin, Amanda Bower, Yuekai SunICLR 2020 · 123 citations
- Learning Certified Individually Fair RepresentationsAnian Ruoss, Mislav Balunovic, Marc Fischer, Martin T. VechevNeurIPS 2020 · 112 citations
- Two Simple Ways to Learn Individual Fairness Metrics from DataDebarghya Mukherjee, Mikhail Yurochkin, Moulinath Banerjee, Yuekai SunICML 2020 · 109 citations
- On the Fairness of Causal Algorithmic RecourseJulius von Kügelgen, Amir-Hossein Karimi, Umang Bhatt, Isabel Valera et al.AAAI 2022 · 99 citations
- On the Adversarial Robustness of Causal Algorithmic RecourseRicardo Dominguez-Olmedo, Amir-Hossein Karimi, Bernhard SchölkopfICML 2022 · 80 citations
Related papers
- Causal Structure-guided Distributionally Robust Optimization under Domain ShiftsSeonggyeom Kim, Eunjung Choi, Dong-Kyu ChaeKDD 2026
- Outlier-Robust Wasserstein DROSloan Nietert, Ziv Goldfeld, Soroosh ShafieeNeurIPS 2023 · 26 citations
- Generalization Bounds with Minimal Dependency on Hypothesis Class via Distributionally Robust OptimizationYibo Zeng, Henry LamNeurIPS 2022 · 11 citations
- Fair Recommendations with Limited Sensitive Attributes: A Distributionally Robust Optimization ApproachTianhao Shi, Yang Zhang, Jizhi Zhang, Fuli Feng et al.SIGIR 2024 · 8 citations
- Learning Antidote Data to Individual UnfairnessPeizhao Li, Ethan Xia, Hongfu LiuICML 2023 · 11 citations
