Adversarial Robustness for Tabular Data through Cost and Utility Awareness
Klim Kireev, Bogdan Kulynych, Carmela Troncoso
Abstract
Many safety-critical applications of machine learning, such as fraud or abuse detection, use data in tabular domains. Adversarial examples can be particularly damaging for these applications. Yet, existing works on adversarial robustness primarily focus on machine-learning models in image and text domains. We argue that, due to the differences between tabular data and images or text, existing threat models are not suitable for tabular domains. These models do not capture that the costs of an attack could be more significant than imperceptibility, or that the adversary could assign different values to the utility obtained from deploying different adversarial examples. We demonstrate that, due to these differences, the attack and defense methods used for images and text cannot be directly applied to tabular settings. We address these issues by proposing new cost and utility-aware threat models that are tailored to the adversarial capabilities and constraints of attackers targeting tabular domains. We introduce a framework that enables us to design attack and defense mechanisms that result in models protected against cost and utility-aware adversaries, for example, adversaries constrained by a certain financial budget. We show that our approach is effective on three datasets corresponding to applications for which adversarial examples can have economic and social implications.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers7
- Constrained Adaptive Attack: Effective Adversarial Attack Against Deep Neural Networks for Tabular DataThibault Simonetto, Salah Ghamizi, Maxime CordyNeurIPS 2024 · 18 citations
- CaFA: Cost-aware, Feasible Attacks With Database Constraints Against Neural Tabular ClassifiersMatan Ben-Tov, Daniel Deutch, Nave Frost, Mahmood SharifS&P 2024 · 7 citations
- Prediction without Preclusion: Recourse Verification with Reachable SetsAvni Kothari, Bogdan Kulynych, Tsui-Wei Weng, Berk UstunICLR 2024 · 7 citations
- Transferable Adversarial Robustness for Categorical Data via Universal Robust EmbeddingsKlim Kireev, Maksym Andriushchenko, Carmela Troncoso, Nicolas FlammarionNeurIPS 2023 · 4 citations
- Robust Fraud Transaction Detection: A Two-Player Game ApproachQi Tan, Yi Zhao, Laizhong Cui, Qi Li et al.NDSS 2026
Builds on10
- Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural NetworksNicholas Carlini, David A. WagnerS&P 2017 · 9,786 citations
- TabNet: Attentive Interpretable Tabular LearningSercan Ö. Arik, Tomas PfisterAAAI 2021 · 2,148 citations
- Fast is better than free: Revisiting adversarial trainingEric Wong, Leslie Rice, J. Zico KolterICLR 2020 · 1,352 citations
- Intriguing Properties of Adversarial ML Attacks in the Problem SpaceFabio Pierazzi, Feargus Pendlebury, Jacopo Cortellazzi, Lorenzo CavallaroS&P 2020 · 334 citations
- Perceptual Adversarial Robustness: Defense Against Unseen Threat ModelsCassidy Laidlaw, Sahil Singla, Soheil FeiziICLR 2021 · 217 citations
Related papers
- Adversarial Robustness with Non-uniform PerturbationsEcenaz Erdemir, Jeffrey Bickford, Luca Melis, Sergül AydöreNeurIPS 2021 · 37 citations
- Cost-Aware Robust Tree Ensembles for Security ApplicationsYizheng Chen, Shiqi Wang, Weifan Jiang, Asaf Cidon et al.USENIX Security 2021 · 26 citations
- On The Empirical Effectiveness of Unrealistic Adversarial Hardening Against Realistic Adversarial AttacksSalijona Dyrmishi, Salah Ghamizi, Thibault Simonetto, Yves Le Traon et al.S&P 2023
- TabLeak: Tabular Data Leakage in Federated LearningMark Vero, Mislav Balunovic, Dimitar Iliev Dimitrov, Martin T. VechevICML 2023 · 14 citations
- Value at Adversarial Risk: A Graph Defense Strategy against Cost-Aware AttacksJunlong Liao, Wenda Fu, Cong Wang, Zhongyu Wei et al.AAAI 2024 · 5 citations
