TabLeak: Tabular Data Leakage in Federated Learning
Mark Vero, Mislav Balunovic, Dimitar Iliev Dimitrov, Martin T. Vechev
Abstract
While federated learning (FL) promises to preserve privacy, recent works in the image and text domains have shown that training updates leak private client data. However, most high-stakes applications of FL (e.g., in healthcare and finance) use tabular data, where the risk of data leakage has not yet been explored. A successful attack for tabular data must address two key challenges unique to the domain: (i) obtaining a solution to a high-variance mixed discrete-continuous optimization problem, and (ii) enabling human assessment of the reconstruction as unlike for image and text data, direct human inspection is not possible. In this work we address these challenges and propose TabLeak, the first comprehensive reconstruction attack on tabular data. TabLeak is based on two key contributions: (i) a method which leverages a softmax relaxation and pooled ensembling to solve the optimization problem, and (ii) an entropy-based uncertainty quantification scheme to enable human assessment. We evaluate TabLeak on four tabular datasets for both FedSGD and FedAvg training protocols, and show that it successfully breaks several settings previously deemed safe. For instance, we extract large subsets of private data at > 90% accuracy even at the large batch size of 128. Our findings demonstrate that current high-stakes tabular FL is excessively vulnerable to leakage attacks.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers3
- Analyzing Inference Privacy Risks Through Gradients In Machine LearningZhuohang Li, Andrew Lowy, Jing Liu, Toshiaki Koike-Akino et al.CCS 2024 · 5 citations
- Mitigating Privacy Risk via Forget Set-Free UnlearningAviraj Newatia, Michael Cooper, Viet Nguyen, Rahul G. KrishnanICLR 2026 · 2 citations
- GRAIN: Exact Graph Reconstruction from GradientsMaria Drencheva, Ivo Petrov, Maximilian Baader, Dimitar Iliev Dimitrov et al.ICLR 2025
Builds on13
- Deep Learning with Differential PrivacyMartín Abadi, Andy Chu, Ian J. Goodfellow, H. Brendan McMahan et al.CCS 2016 · 7,620 citations
- Inverting Gradients - How easy is it to break privacy in federated learning?Jonas Geiping, Hartmut Bauermeister, Hannah Dröge, Michael MoellerNeurIPS 2020 · 1,822 citations
- Exploiting Unintended Feature Leakage in Collaborative LearningLuca Melis, Congzheng Song, Emiliano De Cristofaro, Vitaly ShmatikovS&P 2019 · 1,736 citations
- Evaluating Differentially Private Machine Learning in PracticeBargav Jayaraman, David EvansUSENIX Security 2019 · 586 citations
- Evaluating Gradient Inversion Attacks and Defenses in Federated LearningYangsibo Huang, Samyak Gupta, Zhao Song, Kai Li et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 419 citations
Related papers
- Boosting Gradient Leakage Attacks: Data Reconstruction in Realistic FL SettingsMingyuan Fan, Fuyi Wang, Cen Chen, Jianying ZhouUSENIX Security 2025
- Fast Generation-Based Gradient Leakage Attacks against Highly Compressed GradientsDongyun Xue, Haomiao Yang, Mengyu Ge, Jingwei Li et al.INFOCOM 2023 · 4 citations
- Loki: Large-scale Data Reconstruction Attack against Federated Learning through Model ManipulationJoshua C. Zhao, Atul Sharma, Ahmed Roushdy Elkordy, Yahya H. Ezzeldin et al.S&P 2024 · 64 citations
- LAMP: Extracting Text from Gradients with Language Model PriorsMislav Balunovic, Dimitar I. Dimitrov, Nikola Jovanovic, Martin T. VechevNeurIPS 2022 · 100 citations
- Decepticons: Corrupted Transformers Breach Privacy in Federated Learning for Language ModelsLiam H. Fowl, Jonas Geiping, Steven Reich, Yuxin Wen et al.ICLR 2023 · 10 citations
