Analyzing Inference Privacy Risks Through Gradients In Machine Learning
Zhuohang Li, Andrew Lowy, Jing Liu, Toshiaki Koike-Akino, Kieran Parsons, Bradley A. Malin, Ye Wang
Abstract
In distributed learning settings, models are iteratively updated with shared gradients computed from potentially sensitive user data. While previous work has studied various privacy risks of sharing gradients, our paper aims to provide a systematic approach to analyze private information leakage from gradients. We present a unified game-based framework that encompasses a broad range of attacks including attribute, property, distributional, and user disclosures. We investigate how different uncertainties of the adversary affect their inferential power via extensive experiments on five datasets across various data modalities. Our results demonstrate the inefficacy of solely relying on data aggregation to achieve privacy against inference attacks in distributed learning. We further evaluate five types of defenses, namely, gradient pruning, signed gradient descent, adversarial perturbations, variational information bottleneck, and differential privacy, under both static and adaptive adversary settings. We provide an information-theoretic view for analyzing the effectiveness of these defenses against inference from gradients. Finally, we introduce a method for auditing attribute inference privacy, improving the empirical estimation of worst-case privacy through crafting adversarial canary records.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 7af53299-e338-4ef1-bbba-7513eeb1f57fCited by top-tier papers2
- Faster Algorithms for User-Level Private Stochastic Convex OptimizationAndrew Lowy, Daogao Liu, Hilal AsiNeurIPS 2024 · 4 citations
- CompLeak: Deep Learning Model Compression Exacerbates Privacy LeakageNa Li, Yansong Gao, Hongsheng Hu, Boyu Kuang et al.USENIX Security 2026
Builds on51
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion ModelsRobin Rombach, Andreas Blattmann, Dominik Lorenz, Patrick Esser et al.CVPR 2022 · 13,123 citations
- Deep Learning with Differential PrivacyMartín Abadi, Andy Chu, Ian J. Goodfellow, H. Brendan McMahan et al.CCS 2016 · 7,620 citations
- Membership Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning ModelsReza Shokri, Marco Stronati, Congzheng Song, Vitaly ShmatikovS&P 2017 · 5,137 citations
- Stealing Machine Learning Models via Prediction APIsFlorian Tramèr, Fan Zhang, Ari Juels, Michael K. Reiter et al.USENIX Security 2016 · 2,088 citations
Related papers
- Revisiting Gradient Pruning: A Dual Realization for Defending against Gradient AttacksLulu Xue, Shengshan Hu, Ruizhi Zhao, Leo Yu Zhang et al.AAAI 2024 · 10 citations
- Inf2Guard: An Information-Theoretic Framework for Learning Privacy-Preserving Representations against Inference AttacksSayedeh Leila Noorbakhsh, Binghui Zhang, Yuan Hong, Binghui WangUSENIX Security 2024 · 17 citations
- Soteria: Provable Defense Against Privacy Leakage in Federated Learning From Representation PerspectiveJingwei Sun, Ang Li, Binghui Wang, Huanrui Yang et al.CVPR 2021
- SoK: Let the Privacy Games Begin! A Unified Treatment of Data Inference Privacy in Machine LearningAhmed Salem, Giovanni Cherubin, David Evans, Boris Köpf et al.S&P 2023
- Bayesian Framework for Gradient LeakageMislav Balunovic, Dimitar Iliev Dimitrov, Robin Staab, Martin T. VechevICLR 2022 · 55 citations
