Constrained Adaptive Attack: Effective Adversarial Attack Against Deep Neural Networks for Tabular Data
Thibault Simonetto, Salah Ghamizi, Maxime Cordy
Abstract
State-of-the-art deep learning models for tabular data have recently achieved acceptable performance to be deployed in industrial settings. However, the robustness of these models remains scarcely explored. Contrary to computer vision, there are no effective attacks to properly evaluate the adversarial robustness of deep tabular models due to intrinsic properties of tabular data, such as categorical features, immutability, and feature relationship constraints. To fill this gap, we first propose CAPGD, a gradient attack that overcomes the failures of existing gradient attacks with adaptive mechanisms. This new attack does not require parameter tuning and further degrades the accuracy, up to 81% points compared to the previous gradient attacks. Second, we design CAA, an efficient evasion attack that combines our CAPGD attack and MOEVA, the best search-based attack. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our attacks on five architectures and four critical use cases. Our empirical study demonstrates that CAA outperforms all existing attacks in 17 over the 20 settings, and leads to a drop in the accuracy by up to 96.1% points and 21.9% points compared to CAPGD and MOEVA respectively while being up to five times faster than MOEVA. Given the effectiveness and efficiency of our new attacks, we argue that they should become the minimal test for any new defense or robust architectures in tabular machine learning.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext f18d378a-5b8d-4e52-b6d2-f26ef1fb7919Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on13
- Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attacksFrancesco Croce, Matthias HeinICML 2020 · 2,337 citations
- TabNet: Attentive Interpretable Tabular LearningSercan Ö. Arik, Tomas PfisterAAAI 2021 · 2,148 citations
- On Adaptive Attacks to Adversarial Example DefensesFlorian Tramèr, Nicholas Carlini, Wieland Brendel, Aleksander MadryNeurIPS 2020 · 1,026 citations
- VIME: Extending the Success of Self- and Semi-supervised Learning to Tabular DomainJinsung Yoon, Yao Zhang, James Jordon, Mihaela van der SchaarNeurIPS 2020 · 370 citations
- Feature Selection using Stochastic GatesYutaro Yamada, Ofir Lindenbaum, Sahand Negahban, Yuval KlugerICML 2020 · 39 citations
Related papers
- CaFA: Cost-aware, Feasible Attacks With Database Constraints Against Neural Tabular ClassifiersMatan Ben-Tov, Daniel Deutch, Nave Frost, Mahmood SharifS&P 2024 · 7 citations
- Probabilistic Categorical Adversarial Attack and Adversarial TrainingHan Xu, Pengfei He, Jie Ren, Yuxuan Wan et al.ICML 2023 · 7 citations
- TabReD: Analyzing Pitfalls and Filling the Gaps in Tabular Deep Learning BenchmarksIvan Rubachev, Nikolay Kartashev, Yury Gorishniy, Artem BabenkoICLR 2025
- Fully Test-time Adaptation for Tabular DataZhi Zhou, Kun-Yang Yu, Lan-Zhe Guo, Yufeng LiAAAI 2025 · 11 citations
- Adversarial Robustness for Tabular Data through Cost and Utility AwarenessKlim Kireev, Bogdan Kulynych, Carmela TroncosoNDSS 2023
