Adversarial Robustness with Non-uniform Perturbations
Ecenaz Erdemir, Jeffrey Bickford, Luca Melis, Sergül Aydöre
Abstract
Robustness of machine learning models is critical for security related applications, where real-world adversaries are uniquely focused on evading neural network based detectors. Prior work mainly focus on crafting adversarial examples (AEs) with small uniform norm-bounded perturbations across features to maintain the requirement of imperceptibility. However, uniform perturbations do not result in realistic AEs in domains such as malware, finance, and social networks. For these types of applications, features typically have some semantically meaningful dependencies. The key idea of our proposed approach 1 is to enable non-uniform perturbations that can adequately represent these feature dependencies during adversarial training. We propose using characteristics of the empirical data distribution, both on correlations between the features and the importance of the features themselves. Using experimental datasets for malware classification, credit risk prediction, and spam detection, we show that our approach is more robust to real-world attacks. Finally, we present robustness certification utilizing non-uniform perturbation bounds, and show that non-uniform bounds achieve better certification.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers5
- Verification of Neural Networks' Global RobustnessAnan Kabaha, Dana Drachsler-CohenOOPSLA 2024 · 12 citations
- Fast Projection-Free Approach (without Optimization Oracle) for Optimization over Compact Convex SetChenghao Liu, Enming Liang, Minghua ChenNeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations
- Adversarial Attack and Defense for Non-Parametric Two-Sample TestsXilie Xu, Jingfeng Zhang, Feng Liu, Masashi Sugiyama et al.ICML 2022 · 2 citations
- Disentangling Safe and Unsafe Image Corruptions via Anisotropy and LocalityRamchandran Muthukumar, Ambar Pal, Jeremias Sulam, René VidalCVPR 2025
- Hom-PGD: Fast Reparameterized Optimization over Non-convex Ball-Homeomorphic SetChenghao Liu, Enming Liang, Minghua ChenICML 2026
Builds on7
- Fast is better than free: Revisiting adversarial trainingEric Wong, Leslie Rice, J. Zico KolterICLR 2020 · 1,352 citations
- AI2: Safety and Robustness Certification of Neural Networks with Abstract InterpretationTimon Gehr, Matthew Mirman, Dana Drachsler-Cohen, Petar Tsankov et al.S&P 2018 · 987 citations
- TESSERACT: Eliminating Experimental Bias in Malware Classification across Space and TimeFeargus Pendlebury, Fabio Pierazzi, Roberto Jordaney, Johannes Kinder et al.USENIX Security 2019 · 441 citations
- Intriguing Properties of Adversarial ML Attacks in the Problem SpaceFabio Pierazzi, Feargus Pendlebury, Jacopo Cortellazzi, Lorenzo CavallaroS&P 2020 · 334 citations
- Automatically Evading Classifiers: A Case Study on PDF Malware ClassifiersWeilin Xu, Yanjun Qi, David EvansNDSS 2016 · 249 citations
Related papers
- Adversarial Training for Raw-Binary Malware ClassifiersKeane Lucas, Samruddhi Pai, Weiran Lin, Lujo Bauer et al.USENIX Security 2023
- Improving Robustness of ML Classifiers against Realizable Evasion Attacks Using Conserved FeaturesLiang Tong, Bo Li, Chen Hajaj, Chaowei Xiao et al.USENIX Security 2019 · 95 citations
- DRF: Improving Certified Robustness via Distributional Robustness FrameworkZekai Wang, Zhengyu Zhou, Weiwei LiuAAAI 2024 · 7 citations
- CC-CERT: A Probabilistic Approach to Certify General Robustness of Neural NetworksMikhail Pautov, Nurislam Tursynbek, Marina Munkhoeva, Nikita Muravev et al.AAAI 2022 · 27 citations
- On the Robustness of Domain ConstraintsRyan Sheatsley, Blaine Hoak, Eric Pauley, Yohan Beugin et al.CCS 2021 · 2 citations
