BC-IRL: Learning Generalizable Reward Functions from Demonstrations
Andrew Szot, Amy Zhang, Dhruv Batra, Zsolt Kira, Franziska Meier
Abstract
How well do reward functions learned with inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) generalize? We illustrate that state-of-the-art IRL algorithms, which maximize a maximum-entropy objective, learn rewards that overfit to the demonstrations. Such rewards struggle to provide meaningful rewards for states not covered by the demonstrations, a major detriment when using the reward to learn policies in new situations. We introduce BC-IRL, a new inverse reinforcement learning method that learns reward functions that generalize better when compared to maximum-entropy IRL approaches. In contrast to the MaxEnt framework, which learns to maximize rewards around demonstrations, BC-IRL updates reward parameters such that the policy trained with the new reward matches the expert demonstrations better. We show that BC-IRL learns rewards that generalize better on an illustrative simple task and two continuous robotic control tasks, achieving over twice the success rate of baselines in challenging generalization settings.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext cc11c356-9581-4fce-9487-39e88ec3a82dCited by top-tier papers5
- Coherent Soft Imitation LearningJoe Watson, Sandy H. Huang, Nicolas HeessNeurIPS 2023 · 26 citations
- Rating-Based Reinforcement LearningDevin White, Mingkang Wu, Ellen R. Novoseller, Vernon J. Lawhern et al.AAAI 2024 · 10 citations
- Trust Region Reward Optimization and Proximal Inverse Reward Optimization AlgorithmYang Chen, Menglin Zou, Jiaqi Zhang, Yitan Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 1 citation
- Enhancing Rating-Based Reinforcement Learning to Effectively Leverage Feedback from Large Vision-Language ModelsTung Minh Luu, Younghwan Lee, Donghoon Lee, Sunho Kim et al.ICML 2025
- Generalized Behavior Learning from Diverse DemonstrationsVarshith Sreeramdass, Rohan R. Paleja, Letian Chen, Sanne van Waveren et al.ICLR 2025
Builds on7
- Habitat 2.0: Training Home Assistants to Rearrange their HabitatAndrew Szot, Alexander Clegg, Eric Undersander, Erik Wijmans et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 826 citations
- DD-PPO: Learning Near-Perfect PointGoal Navigators from 2.5 Billion FramesErik Wijmans, Abhishek Kadian, Ari Morcos, Stefan Lee et al.ICLR 2020 · 608 citations
- Generalizable Imitation Learning from Observation via Inferring Goal ProximityYoungwoon Lee, Andrew Szot, Shao-Hua Sun, Joseph J. LimNeurIPS 2021 · 64 citations
- Primal Wasserstein Imitation LearningRobert Dadashi, Léonard Hussenot, Matthieu Geist, Olivier PietquinICLR 2021 · 41 citations
- CausalWorld: A Robotic Manipulation Benchmark for Causal Structure and Transfer LearningOssama Ahmed, Frederik Träuble, Anirudh Goyal, Alexander Neitz et al.ICLR 2021 · 31 citations
Related papers
- Regularized Inverse Reinforcement LearningWonseok Jeon, Chen-Yang Su, Paul Barde, Thang Doan et al.ICLR 2021 · 6 citations
- Maximum Likelihood Constraint Inference for Inverse Reinforcement LearningDexter R. R. Scobee, S. Shankar SastryICLR 2020 · 74 citations
- Trust Region Inverse Reinforcement Learning: Explicit Dual Ascent using Local Policy UpdatesAnish Abhijit Diwan, Davide Tateo, Christopher Mower, Haitham Bou Ammar et al.ICML 2026
- Non-Adversarial Inverse Reinforcement Learning via Successor Feature MatchingArnav Kumar Jain, Harley Wiltzer, Jesse Farebrother, Irina Rish et al.ICLR 2025
- Maximum-Likelihood Inverse Reinforcement Learning with Finite-Time GuaranteesSiliang Zeng, Chenliang Li, Alfredo García, Mingyi HongNeurIPS 2022 · 60 citations
